Saturday, November 30, 2019

CBIC enables GSTR-3A New Facility to issue notices in bulk to Non-Filers through Email

CBIC enables GSTR-3A New Facility to issue notices in bulk to Non-Filers through Email:

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs ( CBIC ) has enabled new facility to issue GSTR-3A notices in bulk to non-files through email for not filing GSTR-3B, GSTR-4, GSTR-5, GSTR-6, GSTR-7, GSTR-8 etc. Asking them to do the needful as soon as possible.

GSTR-3A is a notice for Defaulters for all the Late Filers who have not filed returns. On receiving notice, the defaulter has to file the return within 15 days from the date of notice along with penalty and late fees.

If the default continues even after receiving the notice (GSTR 3A), then provisions of Section 62 will apply on the concerned taxpayer. The proper officer will assess the tax according to his best judgment using the information available with the department. He will not issue any further notice before starting the assessment.

The penalty will be applicable to Rs. 10,000 or 10% of the tax due, whichever is higher.

The penalty which is to be imposed on the defaulter will be Rs. 10,000 or 10% of his total taxable income whichever is higher. To avoid any of the above instances to happen taxpayers are suggested to file their returns on or before time.

The post CBIC enables GSTR-3A New Facility to issue notices in bulk to Non-Filers through Email appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/35McmC8

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Clarification on Job Work : Circular No. 126/45/2019 GST

Clarification on Job Work : Circular No. 126/45/2019 GST

Scope of the notification entry at item (id), related to job work, under heading 9988 of Notification No 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 06 2017

Click here to Read Circular

• Entries at items (id) and (iv) under heading 9988 read as under :

(3) (4) (5)
(id) Services by way of job work other than (i), (ia), (ib) and (ic) above 6
(iv)  Manufacturing  services  on  physical  inputs  (goods) owned  by  others, other than  (i),  (ia), (ib), (ic), (id),  (ii), (iia) and (iii) above 9

• There is a clear demarcation between scope of the entries at item (id) and item (iv) under heading 9988 of Notification No 11/ 2017-Central Tax (Rate)  dated 28 06 2017.

• Entry at item (id) covers only job work services as defined in section 2 (68) of CGST Act, 2017 that is, services by way of
treatment or processing undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person.

• On the other hand, the entry at item (iv) specifically excludes the services covered by entry at item (id), and therefore, covers only such services which are carried out on physical inputs (goods) which are owned by persons other than those registered under the CGST Act

The post Clarification on Job Work : Circular No. 126/45/2019 GST appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2KYJuPe

Option not to file Annual Return : Circular No. 124/43/2019

Option not to file Annual Return : Circular No. 124/43/2019 GST dated 18th November, 2019

• It is clarified that the tax payers, may, at their own option file FORM GSTR 9 for the said financial years before the due ate After the due date of furnishing the annual return for the year 2017 18 and 2018 19 the common portal shall not permit furnishing of FORM GSTR 9 for the said period.

• It is clarified that the tax payers under composition scheme, may, at their own option file FORM GSTR 9 A for the said financial years before the due date After the due date of furnishing the annual return for the year 2017 18 and 2018 19 the common portal shall not permit furnishing of FORM GSTR 9 A for the said period

• Section 73 of the said Act provides for voluntary payment of tax dues by the taxpayers at any point in time Therefore, irrespective of the time and quantum of tax which has not been paid or short paid, the taxpayer has the liberty to self ascertain such tax amount and pay it through FORM GST DRC 03

Accordingly, it is clarified that if any registered tax payer, during course of reconciliation of his accounts, notices any short payment of tax or ineligible availment of input tax credit, he may pay the same through FORM GST DRC 03

You May Also Refer : CBIC Issued Clarification regarding optional filing of GST annual return

The post Option not to file Annual Return : Circular No. 124/43/2019 appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/34sHWEJ

Tuesday, November 26, 2019

E-Invoicing Under GST

GST regime has ushered in a new phase of the digital indirect tax regime by proposing e-invoicing. This step was taken by the Union Finance Minister to bring forward the digital economy to control tax evasion. Recently, GSTN has drafted certain e-Invoicing standards in partnership with ICAI. These are based on globally accepted standards and are currently used in various European countries. With the help of this, the government is aiming to standardize the invoice formats to help in reading these e-invoices across different accounting software.

How e-Invoicing will work?

a) Under the proposed e-invoicing system the suppliers need to generate an Invoice Reference Number (IRN) for each of its invoices.

b) After the IRN is generated, the invoice details along with IRN needs to be notified online on a real-time basis.

c) Thereafter the GSTN portal will cross-verify the IRN and then will provide e-invoice to the supplier. This will also help in auto-populating the fields of GST Returns or e-way bill. These invoice details would also be available to the recipient or buyer which would help him to instantly verify the invoice details.

d) It shall be noted that only invoices with an IRN will be considered as valid tax invoices under this new proposed e-invoicing system.

Just like the e-Way Bill, this proposed e-invoicing system would also be implemented in a phased manner. Initially, it would apply to all the B2B invoices that exceed a particular threshold limit and may extend to B2C invoices soon.

Way Forward for Industry And Government

As an immediate action, the industry needs to examine the notification released by GSTN along with draft e-invoice schema/format.

The e-invoice schema/format offers the various kinds of information which would be populated on the e-invoice to be issued by the GSTN Portal. It also highlights which of this information would be mandatory/optional for businesses to provide.

It is critical that industry studies each of the business scenarios and maps them against e-invoicing requirements carefully to see whether the information required is currently available in their ERPs/ accounting software or would need certain system changes. However, any change in ERP or IT systems to fetch new information can be quite time-consuming, which has been the experience during GST implementation for companies across industries.

Further, any unique industry requirement from an invoice format perspective should also be assessed so that there is a field in the invoice issued by the agency to capture the same. Some finer aspects should also be checked such as the maximum number of characters allowed in a particular field or whether there is a restriction on the number of line items that can be captured as part of e-invoice.

In addition to this, there are quite a few business scenarios which are still ambiguous, such as:

Whether there will be two invoices, one generated from the ERP and second issued by the GSTN Portal online. If yes, which invoice would be the valid invoice for availing credit/ for the movement of the goods?

In case an invoice has been digitally signed by the GSTN Portal online, would there be a need to still sign the invoice by the seller? Will the need to have a digital signature from the seller be done away with?

Is it okay if instead of carrying the complete invoice, the seller only prints the IRN and ships the goods?

How would the cancellation of an invoice or amendment to an invoice be handled under the new e-invoice regime?

What would happen in case internet connectivity is down but the transaction has to be processed? Would an alternative be provided?

There are likely to be many more scenarios for which one doesn’t have clear answers today.

It would be prudent on the part of the industry to file timely representations before the government to list out such issues and business scenarios which require more clarity and have timely discussions with the government for possible solutions. As of now, GSTN has given time till Aug. 20, 2019, to provide feedback on the consultation paper.

Even though the government would provide a manual option to comply with e-invoicing, all large enterprises should evaluate/implement technology solutions to ensure timely compliance without business disruption.

From the government’s perspective, it should first consider extending the time for feedback, as the industry would need to evaluate it in greater detail.

The government must publish a detailed mechanism on how the e-invoicing system would work. This should also capture various scenarios and how the same would be dealt with in the proposed e-invoicing system.

From an IT system standpoint, all necessary steps should be undertaken to ensure that the information is available with the taxpayers on a real-time basis so that there is no business disruption. Starting with voluntary compliance helps eradicate all anomalies before it becomes a mandatory requirement. The government should indicate how taxpayers can continue with business as usual even if there is any challenge in the IT system.

The success of the e-invoicing system would depend on collaborative efforts between government, GSTN, and industry. Industry needs to be proactive in providing inputs to the government to avoid any big surprises at the time of implementation. The government would, on its part, need to be flexible/agile to incorporate all key industry requirements.

E-invoicing presents an opportunity for all stakeholders to make the economy digital and transparent with no need for a paper invoice in the future. The onus is on all stakeholders to make it a reality.

The post E-Invoicing Under GST appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2KUGGTa

Limitation of Interest deduction in certain cases

Limitation of Interest deduction in certain cases

The Concept and reason of introducing Section 94B or Limitation of Interest deduction in certain cases

A company is typically financed or capitalized through a mixture of debt and equity. The way a company is capitalized often has a significant impact on the amount of profit it reports for tax purposes as the tax legislations of countries typically allow a deduction for interest paid or payable in arriving at the profit for tax purposes while the dividend paid on equity contribution is not deductible. Therefore, the higher the level of debt in a company, and thus the amount of interest it pays, the lower will be its taxable profit. For this reason, debt is often a more tax efficient method of finance than equity. Multinational groups are often able to structure their financing arrangements to maximize these benefits. For this reason, country’s tax administrations often introduce rules that place a limit on the amount of interest that can be deducted in computing a company’s profit for tax purposes. Such rules are designed to counter cross-border shifting of profit through excessive interest payments, and thus aim to protect a country’s tax base.

In view of the above, a new section 94B was introduced , in line with the recommendations of OECD BEPS Action Plan 4, to provide that interest expenses claimed by an entity to its associated enterprises shall be restricted to 30% of its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) or interest paid or payable to associated enterprise, whichever is less.[Section 94(2) of Income Tax Act 1961]

For Example if A Ltd ( A UK based Holding Company) gives loan to B Ltd ( A India Based Subsidiary Company) in FY 18-19

Amount of Loan Rs 100 Cr @ 10% interest PA.

EBITDA of B Ltd. Rs. 5 Cr.

Here the limited interest deduction which can be taken is 30% of Rs. 5 Cr. i.e. 1.5 Cr.

The disallowed interest expense shall be carried forward to eight assessment years immediately succeeding the assessment year for which the disallowance was first made and deduction against the income computed under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession to the extent of maximum allowable interest expenditure. [Section 94(4) of Income Tax Act 1961]

As per Section 94(4) of Income Tax Act 1961 the disallowed interest in above example i.e. Rs. 8.5 Cr (Rs. 10 Cr minus Rs. 1.5 Cr) can be carried forward to eight assessment years immediately succeeding AY 19-20.

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this document have been prepared on the basis of relevant provisions and as per the information existing at the time of the preparation. Although care has been taken to ensure the accuracy, completeness and reliability of the information provided, I assume no responsibility therefore. Users of this information are expected to refer to the relevant existing provisions of applicable Laws. The user of the information agrees that the information is not a professional advice and is subject to change without notice. I assume no responsibility for the consequences of use of such information. In no event shall I shall be liable for any direct, indirect, special or incidental damage resulting from, arising out of or in connection with the use of the information

The post Limitation of Interest deduction in certain cases appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2OpFgCp

Saturday, November 23, 2019

SOP on Booking ITC under GST in case of 20% cap [Journal Entries]

SOP on Booking ITC under GST in case of 20% cap [Journal Entries]

• Rule 36(4) inserted in the CGST Rules, 2017

• Input tax credit to be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes, the details of which have not been uploaded by the suppliers in their GSTR-1 under section 37(1), shall not exceed 20 per cent of the eligible credit available in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers under section 37(1).

How to Book ITC under GST in case of 20% cap in Tally?

  • Create a seperate ledger of CGST, SGST & IGST ITC Account-This Account should be different from Current CGST, SGST & IGST ITC Account. You Can name it Un-Reconcilled CGST, SGST & IGST ITC Account.
  • Now Make Monthly Reconcilliation of GSTR-2A and Purchase Ledger. There would be Two Scenarios:

You May Also Refer : Rule 36(4) ITC Restriction : 12 FAQ’s

    • Invoices Present in GSTR-2A but not Purchase Register
      • If it is due to compliance of section 16 or 17 or invoices not related to the taxpayer then it is okay.
      • If some of the invoices are missed by Accountant, then please Add them.
    • Invoices Present in Purchase Register but not GSTR-2A
      • This would be Dealt as per Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules.
  • ITC Relelated to Invoices Present in Purchase Register but not GSTR-2A should be transferred to Un-Reconcilled CGST, SGST & IGST ITC Account
  • Now Calculate 20% of ITC Present in GSTR-2A. This should be transferred to Normal CGST, SGST & IGST ITC Accounts.
  • This will Give the Figures of Eligible ITC which can be used for paying GST Liability.

You May Also Refer : Calculation of Input tax credit as per new GST Rule 36(4)

I am Further Explaining this SOP with an Example and Tally Entries:

Suppose Following Results came after making monthly reconcilliation

ITC as Per Books
CGST SGST IGST
25 25 50
ITC as per GSTR-2A
CGST SGST IGST
20 20 20
Eligible ITC
24 24 24
Ineligible ITC
1 1 26

You May Also Refer : Consequences if 20% ITC RULE 36 (4) is not followed

Entry Number 1

CGST Un-Reconcilled A/C Dr 5
SGST Un-Reconcilled A/C Dr 5
IGST Un-Reconcilled A/C Dr 30
To CGST A/C 5
To SGST A/C 5
To IGST A/C 30

Entry Number 2

SOP on Booking ITC under GST in case of 20% cap [Journal Entries]
SOP on Booking ITC under GST in case of 20% cap [Journal Entries]
  • Now Calculate 20% of ITC Present in GSTR-2A and Transfer to Normal CGST, SGST & IGST ITC Accounts.
CGST A/C Dr 4
SGST A/C Dr 4
IGST A/C Dr 4
To CGST Un-Reconcilled A/C 4
To SGST Un-Reconcilled A/C 4
To IGST Un-Reconcilled A/C 4

You May Also Refer : Changes in GST ITC Availment Conditions

Balance in Legers
CGST A/C 24
SGST A/C 24
IGST A/C 24

You May Also Refer : How to Reconcile the ITC for New Rule 36(4) of CGST Rule, 2017

For Regular Updates Join:

https://t.me/Studycafe

Tags : SOP on Booking ITC under GST in case of 20% cap [Journal Entries], How to Book ITC under GST in case of 20% cap in Tally, Tally Entries of 20% ITC cap

The post SOP on Booking ITC under GST in case of 20% cap [Journal Entries] appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2KOjDcG

Rule 36(4) ITC Restriction : 12 FAQ’s

Rule 36(4) ITC Restriction : 12 FAQ’s

Q1. What is the original source of this Rule 36(4) ?

Section 43A (4) of CGST (Amendment) Act, 2018 which states that :

The procedure for availing input tax credit in respect of outward supplies not furnished under sub-section (3) shall be such as may be prescribed and

  • such procedure may include the maximum amount of the input tax credit which can be so availed, not exceeding
  • twenty percent of the input tax credit available, on the basis of details furnished by the suppliers under the said sub-section.

Note : This section i.e. Section 43A is not effective as on date

You May Also Refer : 20% ITC restrictions : Understanding Circular No. 123/2019 dated 11.11.2019

Q2. Example of 20% restriction ?

Particulars ITC as Per Books ITC as per GSTR-2A Eligible ITC Ineligible ITC
Case -1 100 60 72 28
Case – 2 100 90 100 0

Q3. Is it still mandatory to check conditions of Section 16 of CGST Act, 2017 for claiming ITC ?

YES.

Circular No. 123/42/2019 – GST dated 11th Nov 2019 states that :

“The conditions and eligibility for the ITC that may be availed by the recipient shall continue to be governed as per the provisions of Chapter V of the CGST Act and the rules made thereunder.”

You May Also Refer : Calculation of Input tax credit as per new GST Rule 36(4)

Q4. Whether govt. portal / common portal will calculate the 20% amount and inform about the restriction ? 

NO.

Circular No. 123/42/2019 – GST dated 11th Nov 2019 states that :

“This being a new provision, the restriction is not imposed through the common portal and it is the responsibility of the taxpayer that credit is availed in terms of the said rule and therefore, the availment of restricted credit in terms of sub rule (4) of rule 36 of CGST Rules shall be done on self-assessment basis by the tax payers.”

You May Also Refer : Consequences if 20% ITC RULE 36 (4) is not followed

Q5. Whether the 20% restriction applies on Imports, RCM, ISD also ?

NO.

Circular No. 123/42/2019 – GST dated 11th Nov 2019 states that :

“The taxpayers may avail full ITC in respect of IGST paid on import, documents issued under RCM, credit received from ISD etc. which are outside the ambit of sub-section (1) of section 37, provided that eligibility conditions for availment of ITC are met in respect of the same.”

Q6. Date of applicability of this Rule 36(4) ?

9th Oct 2019.

Q7. Whether we need to check this 20% restriction for the invoices dated prior to 9th Oct 2019 ? 

YES, but only if you are claiming / availing the ITC of those invoices AFTER 9th Oct 2019.

Circular No. 123/42/2019 – GST dated 11th Nov 2019 states that :

“The restriction of 36(4) will be applicable only on the invoices / debit notes on which credit is availed after 09.10.2019”

You May Also Refer : Changes in GST ITC Availment Conditions

Q8. Whether we need to check the 20% restriction supplier wise ?

NO.

Circular No. 123/42/2019 – GST dated 11th Nov 2019 states that :

“The restriction imposed is not supplier wise. The credit available under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 is linked to total eligible credit from all suppliers against all supplies whose details have been uploaded by the suppliers”

Q9. Whether we need to check the 20% on whole ITC or only the eligible ITC ?

ONLY ELIGIBLE ITC.

Circular No. 123/42/2019 – GST dated 11th Nov 2019 states that :

“The calculation would be based on only those invoices which are otherwise eligible for ITC. Accordingly, those invoices on which ITC is not available under any of the provision (say under sub- section (5) of section 17) would not be considered for calculating 20 percent of the eligible credit available.”

Q10. Which day’s GSTR-2A we need to check for 20% ITC restriction ?

11th day of the month succeeding the relevant month (Notification No. 46/2019)

Circular No. 123/42/2019 – GST dated 11th Nov 2019 states that :

“The taxpayer may have to ascertain the same from his auto populated FORM GSTR 2A as available on the due date of filing of FORM GSTR-1 under sub-section (1) of section 37”

You May Also Refer : How to Reconcile the ITC for New Rule 36(4) of CGST Rule, 2017

Q11. When can I claim the full eligible ITC ?

When invoices accumulating to 83.33 % of your total eligible ITC are uploaded by your suppliers in their GSTR-1.

Circular No. 123/42/2019 – GST dated 11th Nov 2019 states that :

“The taxpayer may avail full ITC in respect of a tax period, as and when the invoices are uploaded by the suppliers to the extent Eligible ITC / 1.2.”

Q12. Whether the 20% restriction applies on assessee’s filing Quarterly GSTR-1?

Rule 36(4) ITC Restriction : 12 FAQ's
Rule 36(4) ITC Restriction : 12 FAQ’s

For Regular Updates Join:

https://t.me/Studycafe

The post Rule 36(4) ITC Restriction : 12 FAQ’s appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/33geZKO

Friday, November 22, 2019

Restriction in Input tax credit availment : New Rule 36(4) of CGST Rule, 2017

Restriction in Input tax credit availment : New Rule 36(4) of CGST Rule, 2017

As per New Rule 36(4) of CGST Rule, 2017 Input tax credit to be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes, the details of which have not been uploaded by the suppliers in their GSTR-1 under section 37(1), shall not exceed 20 per cent of the eligible credit available in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers under section 37(1).

Rule 36(4) is given below for reference:

36(4) Input tax credit to be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes, the details of which have not been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37, shall not exceed 20 per cent. of the eligible credit available in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37.

You May Also Refer : 20% ITC restrictions : Understanding Circular No. 123/2019 dated 11.11.2019

• However, concerns were raised in the Notification no. 49/ 2019, dated 09.10.19, over the method of calculating this 20% amount, the cut-off date and also whether it was to be calculated supplier-wise or on a consolidated basis. Therefore, the circular clarifies all these aspects.

• The restriction is not imposed through the common portal and it is the responsibility of the taxpayer that credit is availed in terms of the said rule and therefore, the availment of restricted ITC should be done only on self-assessment basis by the tax payers.

The 20% cap on the eligible Input Tax Credit will not be calculated supplier-wise and not on on a consolidated basis.

• The provisions is applicable from 9th October, 2019.

You May Also Refer : Consequences if 20% ITC RULE 36 (4) is not followed

Restriction in Input tax credit availment : New Rule 36(4) of CGST Rule, 2017

Monthly reconciliation not a easy job :

It is not an easy job to reconcile GSTR-2A and Books on monthly basis in the very short time frame that is provided to the tax payer. Also GSTR-2A is a dynamic form. It changes when invoices are corrected , added or omitted.  This makes the reconciliation process even more difficult.

You May Also Refer : Calculation of Input tax credit as per new GST Rule 36(4)

Ineligible credit reflected in GSTR-2A :

It is not hundred percent guaranteed that all the credits reflecting in GSTR-2A are eligible. It may contain ineligible and even incorrect credits which can be reconciled only after deep scruitney of books.

For computing the eligible credit, the following may be considered as ineligible credit:

a) Credit restricted u/s 17(5) or Blocked Credits.

b) Inwards Supplies used exclusively in providing the exempt supply.

c) Inward Supplies partly used for exempt supply.

d) Inward Supplies partly used for non-business purpose.

You May Also Refer : Changes in GST ITC Availment Conditions

How to Reconcile the ITC for New Rule 36(4) of CGST Rule, 2017

  • Match the invoices / debit notes reflected in both GSTR 2A & Purchase Register.
  •  Now There would be Two Scenarios:
    • Invoices Present in GSTR-2A but not Purchase Register
      • If it is due to compliance of section 16 or 17 or invoices not related to the taxpayer then it is okay.
      • If some of the invoices are missed by Accountant, then please Add them.
    • Invoices Present in Purchase Register but not GSTR-2A
      • This would be Dealt as per Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules.
  • How to Calculated availability of ITC as per new GST Rule 36(4)?
    • Eligible ITC can be calculated as follows : 120% of ITC as per GSTR-2A or ITC as per Books whichever is lowerSo
    • Ineligible ITC will be follows : (ITC as per Books-120% of ITC as per GSTR-2A) or Zero whichever is Higher

You May Also Refer : Clarification On Restriction in availment of ITC w.r.t CGST Rule 36(4) issued by CBIC

Please use the below mentioned example to understand the above mentioned formula

Particulars ITC as Per Books ITC as per GSTR-2A Eligible ITC Ineligible ITC
Case -1 100 60 72 28
Case – 2 100 90 100 0

Disclaimer : The Above Formula and method is based on understanding of Author and is subject to reconciliation of GSTR-2A and Books.

For Regular Updates Join:

https://t.me/Studycafe

The post Restriction in Input tax credit availment : New Rule 36(4) of CGST Rule, 2017 appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2D43FH2

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Calculation of Input tax credit as per new GST Rule 36(4)

Calculation of Input tax credit as per new GST Rule 36(4)

Rule 36(4) is given below for reference:

36(4) Input tax credit to be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes, the details of which have not been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37, shall not exceed 20 per cent. of the eligible credit available in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37.

In Short it means that those credits cannot be taken which are in excess of 20% of credit as appearing in GSTR-2A.

You May Also Refer : 20% ITC restrictions : Understanding Circular No. 123/2019 dated 11.11.2019

• For example, if a buyer is entitled to avail input tax credit of Rs 10 lakh on inward supplies (purchases) in a month but if his suppliers have uploaded the correct invoices in respect of supplies only to the extent of Rs 6 lakhs in the GSTR1 forms uploaded by them, then the buyer can avail ITC of Rs 6 lakh plus 20% of the eligible amount ( 20% of Rs. 6 lakhs) that is Rs 1.2 lakh.

• Therefore the buyer could claim a maximum ITC of Rs 7.2 lakh in the month. The balance can be claimed only after matching.

Credits which are outside purview of this rule are:

1. ITC in respect of the IGST paid on imports;

2. ITC where GST has been paid under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM)

3. ITC in case of Input Service Distributors (ISD).

4. Re-availment of credit under rule 37

5. Re-availment of credit after year under calculation of Rule 42

6. ITC claimed through ITC-01, ITC-02, TRAN-1, TRAN-2 and TRAN-3

You May Also Refer : Consequences if 20% ITC RULE 36 (4) is not followed

Various Problems Faced by Industry :

1. Quarterly Filing of GSTR-1 : Government has not clarified how the input can be taken where the GSTR-1 is being filing Quarterly. This will lead to problem of cash crunch as the person will pay tax in one month and will carry forward excess ITC in other.

2. Ineligible credit reflected in GSTR-2A : It is not hundred percent guaranteed that all the credits reflecting in GSTR-2A are eligible. It may contain ineligible and even incorrect credits which can be reconciled only after deep scruitney of books.

3. Goods in transit: If goods are in transit then condition of sec 16 doesn’t fulfill, hence its ITC cannot be claimed even if they are appearing in 2A.

4. Monthly reconciliation not a easy job : It is not an easy job to reconcile GSTR-2A and Books on monthly basis in the very short time frame that is provided to the tax payer. Also GSTR-2A is a dynamic form. It changes when invoices are corrected , added or omitted.  This makes the reconciliation process even more difficult.

You May Also Refer : Changes in GST ITC Availment Conditions

Should be calculate the Credit restriction Tax head wise or consolidated basis?

Also though no clarification has been received on this issue, but it would be more prudent to calculate the Credit restriction Tax head wise.

A reasoning for same is that since this rule has been bought separately in the 3 Acts,  hence it can be understood that the credit restriction is calculated separately.

Whether the said restriction is to be calculated supplier wise or on consolidated basis?

The restriction imposed is not supplier wise but on consolidated basis.

How to Calculated availability of ITC as per new GST Rule 36(4)?

Eligible ITC can be calculated as follows : 120% of ITC as per GSTR-2A or ITC as per Books whichever is lower

So Ineligible ITC will be follows : (ITC as per Books-120% of ITC as per GSTR-2A) or Zero whichever is Higher.

You May Also Refer : Clarification On Restriction in availment of ITC w.r.t CGST Rule 36(4) issued by CBIC

Please use the below mentioned example to understand the above mentioned formula

Particulars ITC as Per Books ITC as per GSTR-2A Eligible ITC Ineligible ITC
Case -1 100 60 72 28
Case – 2 100 90 100 0

Disclaimer : The Above Formula based on understanding of Author and is subject to reconciliation of GSTR-2A and Books.

For Regular Updates Join:

https://t.me/Studycafe

The post Calculation of Input tax credit as per new GST Rule 36(4) appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/35pQmNa

12 Basic Things you should know about : Blocking of E-waybill generation

1. What is Blocking and Unblocking of E-waybill generation?

Ans: Blocking of e-waybill generation means not allowing the taxpayer to generate e-waybills if he /she has not filed GST Return for latest two successive months or quarters. The blocked GSTIN cannot be used to generate the e-way bills either as Consignor or Consignee. Unblocking means allowing the generation of e-way bills for the GSTIN (if blocked) after the filing of the Return.

2. How does blocking take place in the e-waybill system?

Ans: If the tax payers have not filed the latest two successive month returns on the GST Common Portal, then these tax payers will be blocked for the generation of the e-way bills as per the rule. The E-way Bill system will communicate with the GST Common Portal to find out the filing details of the taxpayers.

You May Also Refer : Blocking of GSTN due to Non Filing of Return-Impact on Transporters

3. How does unblocking take place in e-waybill system?

Ans: If the blocked tax payer has filed the Return on the GST Common Portal, then next day morning his GSTIN is unblocked on the e-way Bill system and allow him to generate the e-way bills.

If the tax payer wants to generate the e-way bills immediately after filing the Return, then he can go to the e-way bill portal and select the option ‘Search —-> Update Block Status ‘ and then enter his/her GSTIN and see the status. If it is blocked then he/she can use update option to get the latest filing status from the GST Common Portal and get unblocked.

Still if the system is not unblocking the GSTIN for e-way bill generation, then he can contact the Help Desk of the GST and raise the complaint to get his/her case resolved.

4. In spite of filing latest Returns, I have been blocked from e-waybill generation. What should I do?

Ans: If the tax payer wants to generate the e-way bills immediately after filing the returns, then he can go to the e-way bill portal and select the option ‘Search —-> Update Block Status ‘ and then enter his/her GSTIN and see the status. If it is blocked then he/she can use update option to get the latest filing status from the GST Common Portal and get unblocked.

Still the system is not unblocking the GSTIN for e-way bill generation, then he can contact the Help Desk of the GST and raise the complaint to get his/her case resolved.

You May Also Refer : Blocking/Unblocking of E way bill generation

5. What happens to the already generated e-way bills of the blocked GSTINs, which are active and in transit?

Ans: There will not be any effect/impact on the already generated e-way bills of the blocked GSTINs. These e-way bills are valid and can be moved to the destination without any problem.

And for these e-way bills, any transporters/tax payers including blocked GSTINs, can update the vehicle and transporter details and carry out the extension, if required, as per the rule.

6. Can one update the vehicle and transporter details and extend the e-way bills, if required, for the e-way bills belonging to the blocked GSTINs?

Ans: The e-way bills, that are already generated and valid, can be updated with vehicle and transporter details and can be extended, if required, by the authorized stake holder (tax payer/transporter) as per rule.

7. Will the e-way bill system block the updating of Transporter Id, if transporter id is blocked?

Ans: Yes, the e-way bill system will also block the updating of Transporter Id, provided he is registered in GST and has not filed the Returns for latest two successive months. However, there will not be any problem in updating of the enrolled transporter id, while generating the e-way bills.

You May Also Refer : How to Unblock the GSTIN for generation of e-waybill

8. Which type of non-filing of GST returns, will lead to blocking of E-Way Bill generation facility on E-Way Bill Portal?

Ans: Non-filing of Return 3B at GST Portal will lead to blocking of E-way bill generation facility on E-way Bill Portal.

9. How much time does it take to update status on E-Way Bill Portal, for generation of E-Way Bill, after return is filed on GST Portal?

Ans: Once the Return is filed on GST Portal, the blocking status is removed by the system next day morning. However, if the tax payer wants to update the status immediately after filing the return, then the taxpayer can go to the e-way bill portal and select the option ‘Search —> Update Block Status ‘ and then enter his/her GSTIN and can use update option to get the latest filing status from the GST Common Portal and get unblocked.

10. What is the effect of blocking/unblocking on the transporters?

Ans: There are two types of transporters – GST registered transporters and E-way Bill enrolled transporters. If the GSTIN of the GST registered transporter is blocked, then that GSTIN cannot be used as Consignor, Consignee or transporter while generating e-way bill and updating transporter details. However, enrolled transporter details can be entered or updated as transporter, while generating e-way bills as he/she is just enrolled on e-way bill portal for movement of goods and he/she is not registered for GST.

11. Whether recipient can generate e-way bill on blocked supplier and vice versa?

Ans: No, if supplier or recipient is blocked for e-way bill generation, then neither supplier nor recipient can generate e-way bill between them.

12. Can transporter generate e-way bill on blocked supplier or recipient?

Ans: No, the transporter also cannot generate the e-way bills, if supplier or recipient is blocked due to non-filing of returns.

The post 12 Basic Things you should know about : Blocking of E-waybill generation appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/348UTDD

Blocking of GSTN due to Non Filing of Return-Impact on Transporters

Blocking of GSTN due to Non Filing of Return-Impact on Transporters

There are two types of transporters – GST registered transporters and E-way Bill enrolled transporters. If the GSTIN of the GST registered transporter is blocked, then that GSTIN cannot be used as Consignor, Consignee or transporter while generating e-way bill and updating transporter details. However, enrolled transporter details can be entered or updated as transporter, while generating e-way bills as he/she is just enrolled on e-way bill portal for movement of goods and he/she is not registered for GST.

Whether recipient can generate e-way bill on blocked supplier and vice versa?

Ans: No, if supplier or recipient is blocked for e-way bill generation, then neither supplier nor recipient can generate e-way bill between them.

Can transporter generate e-way bill on blocked supplier or recipient?

Ans: No, the transporter also cannot generate the e-way bills, if supplier or recipient is blocked due to non-filing of returns.

Will the e-way bill system block the updating of Transporter Id, if transporter id is blocked?

Ans: Yes, the e-way bill system will also block the updating of Transporter Id, provided he is registered in GST and has not filed the Returns for latest two successive months. However, there will not be any problem in updating of the enrolled transporter id, while generating the e-way bills.

You May Also Refer : Blocking/Unblocking of E way bill generation

What happens to the already generated e-way bills of the blocked GSTINs, which are active and in transit?

Ans: There will not be any effect/impact on the already generated e-way bills of the blocked GSTINs. These e-way bills are valid and can be moved to the destination without any problem. And for these e-way bills, any transporters/tax payers including blocked GSTINs, can update the vehicle and transporter details and carry out the extension, if required, as per the rule.

You May Also Refer : How to Unblock the GSTIN for generation of e-waybill

Can one update the vehicle and transporter details and extend the e-way bills, if required, for the e-way bills belonging to the blocked GSTINs?

Ans: The e-way bills, that are already generated and valid, can be updated with vehicle and transporter details and can be extended, if required, by the authorized stake holder (tax payer/transporter) as per rule.

The post Blocking of GSTN due to Non Filing of Return-Impact on Transporters appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2QA7EDg

Brief Introduction to Transfer Pricing Law In India

Brief Introduction to Transfer Pricing Law In India
Brief Introduction to Transfer Pricing Law In India

Brief Introduction to Transfer Pricing Law In India : Intent behind introduction of Transfer Pricing (TP) Provisions

Concept of Transfer Pricing

Applicability of Transfer Pricing Provisions

  • The provisions of Section 92 to 92F of the Act are applicable only if:
    • There are two or more enterprises (defined in Sec 92F); and
    • The enterprises are Associated Enterprises (defined in Sec 92A); and
    • The enterprises enter into a transaction (defined in Sec 92F); and
    • The transaction is an International transaction (defined in Sec 92B).
  • Further w.e.f. 1 April 2012, TP provisions shall also apply to specified domestic transactions (SDTs) (defined in Sec 92BA)
  • Section 92(1)
    • Any income arising from an international transaction shall be computed having regard to the arm’s length price
    • Explanation – the allowance for any expense or interest arising from an international transaction shall also be determined having regard to the arm’s length price
  • Section 92(3) The provisions are not intended to be applied in case determination of arm’s length price reduces the income chargeable to tax or increases the loss as the case may be.

Compliance Requirement

Meaning of Associated Enterprises (Sec 92A)

Deemed Associated enterprises (Sec 92A(2))

Recent case law – Over 20% sales to two customers constitutes ‘dominant influence’; Upholds Associated enterprise relationship

Hospira Healthcare India Private Limited [TS-147-ITAT-2017(CHNY)-TP]
Facts of the case –

  • Hospira Healthcare India Private Limited, is engaged in manufacturing and selling of generic injectable drugs to its group entities and certain other concerns called as distribution partners.
  • Distribution partners sells the goods to end customer and eventually decides final sales price to the customer
  • Profits out of the transaction is distributed equally between Hospira and Distribution partners
  • During year, Assessee has made sales of more than 20% to Apotex Corp and Apotex Inc and the profit share earned from them aggregated to Rs 30.07 crores out of total profits of Rs. 125.25 crores

Ruling ITAT held that a person who purchased more than 1/5th of the total sales of assessee would have a distinctly dominant influence on the pricing and can exercise a defacto control over the assessee and can be treated as Associated enterprise

Comment Tax authorities may use the above ruling and take assessee within the framework of transfer pricing.

Hence, following should be evaluated 

a) Is there any overseas party to whom there is sales of more than 20% (Defacto control – satisfying conditions laid down in Section 92A(1))

b) Are the prices influenced by the overseas party (Satisfying deeming condition laid down in Section 92A(2)(i))

c) Even if assessee is of the view that prices are not influenced but sales are more than 20% to one party, position can be taken to file form 3CEB on an abundant caution basis to protect assessee from transfer pricing penalties

International Transaction (Sec 92B)

  • Transactions between two or more AEs, either or both of whom are non-residents
  • Transaction relates to:
    • Purchase, sale or lease of tangible or intangible property; or
    • Provision of services; or
    • Lending or borrowing money; or
    • Any other transaction having a bearing on the profits, income, losses or assets of the enterprises; or
    • Mutual agreements or arrangements for allocation or apportionment of, or any contribution to, any cost or expense incurred; or
    • Business restructuring or reorganization irrespective of fact that it has bearing on the profit, income, losses or assets

As per Section 92F(V):

  • transaction includes an arrangement, understanding or action in concert
    • (A) whether or not such arrangement, understanding or action is formal or in writing: or
    • (B) whether or not such arrangement, understanding or action is intended to be enforceable by legal proceeding.

Deemed International transaction- Sec 92B(2)

  • An transaction with an unrelated company (3rd party) is deemed to be an international transaction and subject to transfer pricing regulations if
    • a prior agreement exists between A’s AE and 3rd party in relation to services rendered by A to the 3rd party; or
    • terms of transaction are determined in substance by A’s AE and 3rd party

TP

Domestic Transfer Pricing

Specified Domestic Transaction – Sec 92(2A)

  • Scope of TP provisions expanded w.e.f. AY 2013-14 by including SDT if aggregate value of such transaction exceeds INR 50 Million ( INR 5 Crores)

[Threshold increased to INR 20 Crores by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 1 April 2016]

  • Applicability of TP regulations (including procedural and penalty provisions) to specified transactions between domestic related parties and payments made to related parties.
  • Section 92BA – Specified Domestic Transactions in case of an Assessee means any of the following transactions, not being an international transaction, namely –
  1. Any expenditure in respect of which payment is made or to be made to a person u/s 40A(2)(b); (Omitted by the Finance Act, 2017, w.e.f. FY 2016-17)
  2. Tax holiday related transactions (eligible business);
  3. Any transaction referred u/s 80A;
  4. Any transfer of goods/services u/s 80-IA;
  5. Any business transaction u/s 80-IA(10);
  6. Any transaction under Chapter VI-A or u/s 10AA to which provisions of Sec 80-IA (8) or (10) applies; or
  7. Any other transaction as may be prescribed.
  • All provisions applicable for determination of ALP for international transactions would apply in case of SDT also. Also penal provisions applicable to international transactions would apply to SDT

TP Documentation & Penalties

  • Ownership Structure
  • Profile of multinational group
  • Business description/ Profile of industry
Entity Related
  • Nature and terms (including price) of international transactions
  • Description of functions performed, risk assumed and assets employed (functional analysis)
  • Records of economic and market analysis (economic analysis)
  • Record of budgets, forecasts, financial estimates
  • Any other record of analysis (if, any) to evaluate comparability of international transaction with uncontrolled transaction(s)
  • Description of method considered with reasons of rejection of other methods
  • Details of transfer pricing adjustment(s) made (if, any)
Price Related
Any other information e.g. data, documents like invoices, agreements, price related correspondence etc. Transaction Related

 

  • Detailed documentation not required in case aggregate transaction value is less than INR 1 Crore
  • In case aggregate value of transaction is less than 1 Crore, detailed documentation is not required provided that the assessee has required documents to substantiate, on the basis of material available with him, that income/expense arising from international transactions entered into by him has been computed in accordance with section 92.
  • List of supporting documents are also provided in the law
  • Contemporaneous data requirements
  • Documents to be retained for a fixed period from end of the assessment year
  • Need to obtain Accountant’s report (under Form 3CEB) to be filed along with the return of income

Transfer Pricing Penalties-Section 271

Nature of Default Penalty
Post-inquiry adjustment (deemed concealment of income) —> u/s 270A 50% / 200% of tax on the adjusted amount
Failure to maintain information or documents; or
Fails to report transactions; or
Fails to maintain proper documentation; or
Furnishes an incorrect information or documents u/s 271AA
2% of the transaction value
Failure to furnish information or documents u/s 271G 2% of the transaction value
Failure to furnish accountants report (Form 3CEB) u/s 271BA Rs 100,000

Empowering the TPO to levy penalty under section 271G

  • The existing provisions of section 271G of the Act provide that if any person who has entered into an international transaction or specified domestic transaction fails to furnish any such document or information as required by sub-section (3) of section 92D, then such person shall be liable to a penalty up to 2% of the value of international transactions (or specified domestic transaction) which may be levied by the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals).
  • Given that determination of ALP in several cases is done by TPOs, TPOs are now empowered to levy penalty under section 271G for failure to furnish information/ documentation.
  • The amendment came into effect from 1 October 2014.
  • Need to be mindful of the 30 days time limit for submission of information/ documents during the course of transfer pricing audits

This article is for Discussion purpose only.


This article is written by CA Rajat Bansal. He can be contacted at Email –carajatbansal35@gmail.com

The post Brief Introduction to Transfer Pricing Law In India appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2O5fqmR

FAQs on Provisions useful for non-residents

FAQs on Provisions useful for non-residents

Is the residential status of a person relevant for determining the taxability of the income in his hands?

Yes, the residential status of a person earning income is very much relevant for determining the taxability of such income in his hands.

Taxability of any income in the hands of a person depends on the following two things :

(1) Residential status of the person as per the Income-tax Law; and

(2) Nature of income earned by him.

Hence, residential status plays a vital role in determining the taxability of the income.​

What are the different classes of residential status prescribed under the Income-tax Law for an individual?

For the purpose of Income-tax Law, an individual can have any one of the following residential status:

(1) Resident and ordinarily resident in India (also known as resident)

(2) Resident but not ordinarily resident in India

(3) Non-resident

Every year the residential status of the taxpayer is to be determined by applying the provisions of the Income-tax Law designed in this regard (discussed later) and, hence, it may so happen that in one year the individual would be a resident and ordinarily resident and in the next year he may become non-resident or resident but not ordinarily resident and again in the next year his status may change or may remain same.

Will a person holding Indian citizenship be treated as a resident in India for the purpose of charging Income-tax?

​​​The Income-tax Law has its own set of provisions for determining the residential status of a person. Thus, while determining the residential status of a person under the Income-tax Law, the facts like Indian citizenship, Indian passport, etc., have no relevance. From the point of view of Income-tax Law, a person will be treated as a resident in India if he satisfies the criteria specified in this regard under the Income-tax Act. ​

What are the different classes of residential status prescribed under the Income-tax Law for a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF)?

For the purpose of Income-tax Law, a HUF can have any one of the following residential status:

(1) Resident and ordinarily resident in India

(2) Resident but not ordinarily resident in India

(3) Non-resident

Every year the residential status of the taxpayer is to be determined by applying the provisions of the Income-tax Law designed in this regard (discussed later) and, hence, it may so happen that in one year the HUF would be a resident and ordinarily resident and in the next year it may become non-resident or resident but not ordinarily resident and again in the next year its status may change or may remain same. ​

What are the different classes of residential status prescribed under the Income-tax Law for a person other than an individual or a HUF?

For the purpose of Income-tax Law, a person other than an individual or a HUF, i.e., company, partnership firm, etc., can have any one of the following residential status:

(1) Resident

(2) Non-resident

Every year the residential status of the taxpayer is to be determined by applying the provisions of the Income-tax Law designed in this regard (discussed later) and, hence, it may so happen that in one year the taxpayer would be a resident and in the next year may become non-resident and again in the next year the status may change or may remain same.

How to determine the residential status of an Individual?

To determine the residential status of an individual, the first step is to ascertain whether he is resident or non-resident. If he turns to be a resident, then the next step is to ascertain whether he is resident and ordinarily resident or is a resident but not ordinarily resident.

Step 1 given below will ascertain whether the individual is resident or non-resident and step 2 will ascertain whether he is ordinarily resident or not ordinarily resident. Step 2 is to be performed only if the individual turns to be a resident.

Step 1: Determining whether resident or non-resident

Under the Income-tax Law, an individual will be treated as a resident in India for a year if he satisfies any of the following conditions (i.e. may satisfy any one or may satisfy both the conditions):

(1) He is in India for a period of 182 days or more in that year; or

(2) He is in India for a period of 60 days or more in the year and for a period of 365 days or more in 4 years immediately preceding the relevant year.

If an individual does not satisfy any of the above conditions he will be treated as non-resident in India.

Note : Condition given in (2) above will not apply to an Indian citizen leaving India for the purpose of employment or to an Indian citizen leaving India as a member of crew of Indian ship or to an Indian citizen/person of Indian origin coming on a visit to India. A person is said to be of Indian origin, if he or any of his parents or grand-parents (maternal or paternal) were born in undivided India.

Note: With effect from Assessment Year 2015-16, in the case of an individual, being a citizen of India and a member of the crew of a foreign bound ship leaving India, the period or peri​ods of stay in India shall, in respect of such voyage, be determined in the manner and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.

Step 2: Determining whether resident and ordinarily resident or resident but not ordinarily resident

A resident individual will be treated as resident and ordinarily resident in India during the year if he satisfies following conditions:

(1) He is resident in India for at least 2 years out of 10 years immediately preceding the relevant year.

(2) His stay in India is for 730 days or more during 7 years immediately preceding the relevant year.

A resident individual who does not satisfy any of the aforesaid conditions or satisfies only one of the aforesaid conditions will be treated as resident but not ordinarily resident.

In short, following test will determine the residential status of an individual:

  • If the individual satisfy any one or both the conditions specified at step 1 and satisfies both the conditions specified at step 2, then he will become resident and ordinarily resident in India.
  • If the individual satisfy any one or both the conditions specified at step 1 and satisfies none or one condition specified at step 2, then he will become resident but not ordinarily resident in India.
  • If the individual satisfy no conditions satisfied at step one, then he will become non-resident.

How to determine the residential status of a HUF for the purpose of the Income-tax Law?

To determine the residential status of a HUF, the first step is to ascertain whether the HUF is resident or a non-resident. If the HUF turns to be a resident, then the next step is to ascertain whether it is resident and ordinarily resident or is resident but not ordinarily resident.

Step 1 given below will ascertain whether the HUF is resident or non-resident and step 2 will ascertain whether the HUF is ordinarily resident or not ordinarily resident. Step 2 is to be performed only if the HUF turns to be a resident.

Step 1: Determining whether resident or non-resident

For the purpose of Income-tax Law, a HUF will be treated as resident in India, if the control and management of the affairs of the HUF is located (partly or wholly) in India.

Step 2: Determining whether resident and ordinarily resident or resident but not ordinarily resident

A resident HUF will be treated as resident and ordinarily resident in India during the year if its manager (i.e. karta or manager) satisfies both the following conditions :

(1) He is resident in India for at least 2 years out of 10 years immediately preceding the relevant year.

(2) His stay in India is for 730 days or more during 7 years immediately preceding the relevant year.

A resident HUF whose manager (i.e. karta or manager) does not satisfy any of the aforesaid conditions or satisfies only one of the aforesaid conditions will be treated as resident but not ordinarily resident.

In short, following test will determine the residential status of a HUF :

  • If the control and management of the affairs of the HUF is located (partly or wholly) in India and the manager (i.e. karta or manager) satisfies both the conditions specified at step 2, then the HUF will become resident and ordinarily resident in India.
  • If the control and management of the affairs of the HUF is located (partly or wholly) in India and the manager (i.e. karta or manager) satisfies none or only one condition specified at step 2, then the HUF will become resident but not ordinarily resident in India.
  • If the control and management of the affairs of the HUF is located wholly outside India, then the HUF will become non-resident.

How to determine the residential status of a company?

With effect from Assessment Year 2017-18, a company is said to be resident in India in any previous year, if:

(i) it is an Indian company; or

(ii) its place of effective management, at any time in that year, is in India.

For this purpose, the “place of effective management” means a place where key management and commercial decisions that are necessary for the conduct of the business of an entity as a whole are, in substance made.

The concept of POEM is effective from Assessment Year 2017-18. The CBDT has issued the final guidelines for determination of POEM of a foreign company.

The final guidelines on POEM contain some unique features. One of the unique features is test of Active Business Outside India (ABOI). The guidelines prescribe that a company shall be said to engaged in ‘active business outside India’ if passive income is not more than 50% of its total income. Further, there are certain additional cumulative conditions to be satisfied regarding location of total assets, employees and payroll expenses.

The place of effective management in case of a company engaged in active business outside India shall be presumed to be outside India if the majority meetings of the board of directors of the company are held outside India.

In cases of companies other than those that are engaged in active business outside India, the determination of POEM would be a two stage process, namely:—

  1. First stage would be identification or ascertaining the person or persons who actually make the key management and commercial decision for conduct of the company’s business as a whole.
  2. Second stage would be determination of place where these decisions are in fact being made.

However, it has been provided that the POEM guidelines shall not apply to a company having turnover or gross receipts of INR 50 crores or less in a financial year vide CIRCULAR NO.8, DATED 23-2-2017.

(To know more about POEM guidelines, read CIRCULAR NO.6, DATED 24-1-2017.)

How to determine the residential status of a person other than an individual, HUF and company?

​Every person other than an individual, HUF and company is said to be resident in India during the year, if the control and management of its affairs for that year is located wholly or partly in India.

Which incomes are charged to tax in India in the hands of a taxpayer?

The following chart highlights the tax incidence in case of different persons:

 

Nature of income Residential status ​​
ROR (*) RNOR (*) NR (*)
Income which accrues or arises in India Taxed Taxed Taxed
Income which is deemed to accrue or arise in India Taxed Taxed Taxed
Income which is received in India Taxed Taxed Taxed
Income which is deemed to be received in India Taxed Taxed Taxed
Income accruing outside India from a business controlled from India or from a profession set up in India Taxed Taxed Not taxed
Income other than above (i.e., income which has no relation with India) Taxed Not taxed Not taxed

(*) ROR means resident and ordinarily resident.

RNOR means resident but not ordinarily resident.

NR means non-resident.​

What incomes are deemed to have accrue or arise in India?

Following incomes are treated as incomes deemed to have accrued or arisen in India:

  • Capital gain arising on transfer of property situated in India.
  • Income from business connection in India.
  • Income from salary in respect of services rendered in India.
  • Salary received by an Indian national from Government of India in respect of service rendered outside India.
  • However, allowances and perquisites are exempt in this case.
  • Income from any property, asset or other source of income located in India.
  • Dividend paid by an Indian company.
  • Interest received from Government of India.
  • Interest received from a resident is treated as income deemed to have accrued or arisen in India in all cases, except where such interest is earned in respect of funds borrowed by the resident and used by resident for carrying on business/profession outside India or is in respect of funds borrowed by the resident and is used for earning income from any source outside India.
  • Interest received from a non-resident is treated as income deemed to accrue or arise in India if such interest is in respect of funds borrowed by the non-resident for carrying on any business/profession in India.
  • Royalty/fees for technical services received from Government of India.
  • Royalty/fees for technical services received from resident is treated as income deemed to have accrued or arisen in
  • India in all cases, except where such royalty/fees relates to business/profession/other source of income carried on by the payer outside India.
  • Royalty/fees for technical services received from non-resident is treated as income deemed to have accrued or arisen in India if such royalty/fees is for business/profession/other source of income carried by the payer in India.

Income arising outside India, being any sum of money referred to in sub-clause (xviia) of clause (24) of section 2, paid on or after 05-07-2019 by a person resident in India to a non-resident.​

When is a business connection said to be established?

Business connection includes a profession at connection. Business connection includes any activity carried out through a person acting on behalf of a non-resident who performs any one or more of the following:

  • If such person has in India authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the non-resident (it will not include cases where authority is restricted to contract for purchase of goods or merchandise on behalf such non-resident); or
  • If such person in India habitually maintains stock of goods or merchandise from which he regularly delivers goods or merchandise on behalf of the non-resident;
  • If such person habitually secures orders in India mainly or wholly for the non-resident or for the other non-resident under the same management.

No business connection shall be deemed to have been established, if the business is carried on through an independent broker, general commission agent or other agent (i.e., a broker or commission agent who is not working mainly or wholly for such non-resident or other non-resident under same management), provided such person is working in his ordinary course of business.

Only so much of income which accrues or arises due to such business connection is deemed to be income accruing or arising from India and not the entire income of the non-resident.

What are the other provisions under the Income-tax Act which are applicable to a Non-Resident?

​Refer chart and Table on ‘Non-Resident Benefit Allowable’.

What is the objective of FEMA?

The main objective of FEMA is to facilitate external trade and payments and for promoting the orderly development and maintenance of foreign exchange market in India. FEMA deals with provisions relating to procedures, formalities, dealings, etc. of foreign exchange transactions in India. The transactions relating to foreign exchange have been classified under FEMA into two main categories, viz., (1) Current Account Transaction, (2) Capital Account Transaction.

What is capital account transaction?

​​​​As defined in Section 2(e)​ of the FEMA, “capital account transaction” means transactions which alters the assets or liabilities, including contingent liabilities outside India, of persons resident in India or assets or liabilities, in India, of persons resident outside India and includes transactions referred to in section 6(3)​ of the FEMA. Transactions covered in section 6(3) of FEMA are as follows: –

  • Transfer or issue of any foreign security by a person resident in India.
  • Transfer or issue of any security by a person resident outside India.
  • Transfer or issue of any security or foreign security by any branch, office or agency in India of a person resident outside India.
  • Any borrowing or lending in foreign exchange in whatever form by whatever name called.
  • Any borrowing or lending in rupees in wh​atever form or whatever name called between a person resident in India and a person resident outside India.
  • Deposits between persons resident in India and persons resident outside India.
  • Export, import or holding of currency or currency notes.
  • Transfer of immovable property outside India, other than a lease not exceeding five years by a person resident in India.
  • Acquisition or transfer of immovable property in India, other than lease not exceeding five years by a person resident outside India.
  • Giving of a guarantee or surety in respect of any debt, obligation or other liability incurred –
    • by a person resident in India and owed to a person resident outside India or
    • by a person resident outside India. ​

Note : Section 6(3) has been omitted by Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f. a date yet to be notified.

What is current account transaction?

​​​​As defined in Section 2(j)​ of the FEMA, “current account transaction” means a transaction other than a capital account transaction and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing such transaction includes :–

  • Payments due in connection with foreign trade, other current business, services and short-term banking and credit facilities in the ordinary course of business,
  • Payments due as interest on loans and as net income from investments,
  • Remittances for living expenses of parents, spouse and children residing abroad, and
  • Expenses in connection with foreign travel, education and medical care of parents, spouse and children.
  • In terms of section 5 of the FEMA, Any person may sell or draw foreign exchange to or from an authorized person if such sale or drawl is a current account transaction provided that Central Government may, in public interest and in consultation with the Reserve Bank, impose such reasonable restrictions for current account transactions as may be prescribed. .

What are the major provisions covered in FEMA, 1999?

​The major provisions of FEMA, 1999 relate to following matters :

  • Dealing in foreign exchange, etc.
  • Holding of foreign exchange, etc.
  • Current account transactions
  • Capital account transactions
  • Export of goods and services
  • Realization and repatriation of foreign exchange
  • Exemption from realization and repatriation in certain cases.
  • Provisions relating to authorised persons. i.e. authorised by RBI to deal with foreign exchange or in foreign securities
  • Power of RBI to inspect authorized person
  • Contravention and penalties
  • Adjudication and appeal
  • Directorate of enforcement
  • Miscellaneous provisions

For more details on FEMA refer to the FAQ section at www.rbi.org.in

The post FAQs on Provisions useful for non-residents appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/33bepxL

AUDIT REPORT FORMAT OF LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP

AUDIT REPORT FORMAT OF LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP

Is Audit Report required for LLP?

In case total turnover of the Limited Liability Identification Number/ Foreign Limited Liability Identification Number exceeds Rs. 40 lakhs or partner’s obligation of contribution exceeds Rs. 25 lakh, then the LLP/ FLLP is required to get it’s accounts audited by a Chartered Accountant.

Below is Format of Audit Report Format of Limited Liability Partnership for reference:

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

To
The Partners of
_________________
(LLPIN: ________)

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the financial statements of ___________________ LLP (“the LLP”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2019, the Statement of Profit and Loss for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position and financial performance of the LLP in accordance with Accounting Standards and accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the LLP’s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone financial statements.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us. the financial statements are prepared, in all material aspects, in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the LLP as at 31st March, 2019; and

(b) and the Statement of Profit and Loss for the profit of the LLP for the year ended on that date.

For ____________
Chartered Accountants
Firm Regn No – _________

Proprietor
____________
Membership No : _______
Date :_________
Place : Faridabad

UDIN : ________

Disclaimer : This is just a draft Audit report format and not something prescribed by any Act.

For Regular Updates Join:

https://t.me/Studycafe

The post AUDIT REPORT FORMAT OF LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2XD8IYC

Cancellation/Surrendering of TAN [Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number]

Cancellation/Surrendering of TAN [Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number]

Cancellation of TAN is done in 2 situations:

  1. When duplicate TAN has been allocated and the deductor has to cancel the ‘Duplicate –Unused TAN.
  2. When the Allocated TAN is no more required by the deductor.

How can I cancel my TAN Number?

When duplicate TAN has been allocated and the deductor has to cancel the ‘Duplicate –Unused TAN

What is duplicate TAN?

Duplicate TAN is a TAN which has been inadvertently obtained by a person who is responsible for deducting/collecting tax and who already has a TAN allotted to him. It is illegal to possess or use more than one TAN. Different branches/divisions of an entity may, however, have separate TANs.

In case duplicate TAN has been allotted, which TAN should be used?

In case duplicate TANs have been allotted, the TAN which has been used regularly should be continued to be used. The other TAN/s should be surrendered for cancellation using ‘Form for Changes or Correction in TAN’ which can be downloaded from NSDL-TIN website or may be procured from TIN-FCs or other vendors.

What should I do if I have been allotted a duplicate TAN by oversight?

Fill the Form Apply for Changes or Correction in TAN.

For Cancellation of Duplicate TAN, this form can be download from website of TIN-NSDL.

For Cancellation of TAN, fill all mandatory fields in the Form, enter TAN to be cancelled in Item No.6 of the Form and select the check box on left margin.

TAN to be cancelled should not be same as TAN (the one currently used) mentioned at the top of the Form.

This application can be made physically and online as well.

When the Allocated TAN is no more required by the deductor

Cancellation/Surrendering of TAN [Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number]
Cancellation/Surrendering of TAN [Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number]
, requesting for cancellation of TAN and state reasons for such a request. Usually we surrender TAN only in case of closure of Business:

Format of request letter for TAN Surrender is given below for reference:

The Assessing officer (TDS),
TDS Ward

Dear Sir,

Re: Application for Surrender of TAN ——–

We , (Name of the Organization), were engaged into the business of (details of business activity). We have obtained the TAN registration because_____________. Accordingly the TAN was allotted and above mentioned (TAN No…………) was issued.

We have been regularly filing TDS returns and paying TDS in respect of the (above mentioned payments). However, we have decided to discontinue operations in the state of ____ due to (Reason to discontinue).

Screen shot of TRACES along with copy of last income tax returns are enclosed as a proof of no dues pending.

We hereby further undertake that if any Government dues are found to be recoverable against us in future and demanded raised by the Income Tax Department, We shall deposit the same immediately along with Interest.

In view of the above we request you to please cancel our TAN registration with immediate effect.

Authorised Signatory

Place:
Date:

Tags : draft letter surrender tan, Cancellation/Surrendering of TAN, Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number

The post Cancellation/Surrendering of TAN [Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number] appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/35jrF54

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Taxpayers should not wait till the last three days to file their returns: GSTN

Taxpayers should not wait till the last three days to file their returns: GSTN

CBIC dismisses complaints of GSTN not working for filing of GSTR-3B for October 2019

The Official Twitter handle @askGSTech of the Government for IT related queries on GST has dismissed Certain complaints made yesterday on the social media regarding GSTN system not functioning are incorrect. GSTN assures that the GST Return filing system was working within expected limits. The following tweet has been posted in this regard.

GSTN statement on filing of GSTR-3B (October 2019)

20th Nov. 2019

New Delhi: Certain complaints made yesterday on the social media regarding GSTN system not functioning are incorrect. GSTN assures that the GST Return filing system was working within expected limits. Had it not been so, how more than 11.52 lakh GSTR3B (October) returns could have been filed yesterday on 19th Nov wi’th about 1.82 lakh returns filed in a peak hour. Also, on 18th Nov more than 8.14 lakh returns were filed while today on 20th Nov more than 9.23 lakh GSTR 38 returns were filed by 4.00 pm and filing is going on smooth with 6.30 lakh returns filed between 12 to 4 pm.

Any online system has to have a load threshold and for GST return filing system it is at 1.5 lakh returns filing at a particular moment. If this threshold is reached then the site shows a message asking the taxpayer to wait for his turn in a few minutes.

Referring to complaints, it is stated that it could have been possible that some filers may have momentarily experienced being logged out at the load threshold of 1.5 lakh returns load at a particular point of time or some difficulty due to any local issue at the taxpayer filers’ end. But the GST return filing system has been working as expected and coherently and a total of more than 55.79 lakh returns were filed by 4.00 pm today.

The taxpayers are requested that they should not wait till the last three days to file their returns as normally there may be huge rush of return filing on these days. Rather they should file their return on days other than the last three days to avoid rush hour momentary difficulty in filing.

You May Also Like: CBIC clarifes fully electronic refund process through FORM GST RFD-01

The post Taxpayers should not wait till the last three days to file their returns: GSTN appeared first on Studycafe.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2XCNl9F