Tuesday, August 31, 2021

Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course

Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course

In our continuous endeavor to empower more and more finance professionals, this Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course has been designed for you.  Detailed 2 Days course has been designed where daily more than 2 hrs sessions have been organized. This Course contains Videos along with study material, Google Sheet Files. Live training on Google Sheet will be given.

How I will get the course:

This is an online Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course so there will not be any physical delivery of the lectures. After the purchase of the Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course, you can see the Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course under my account option under purchased courses. All the videos, study materials, PDF files, PPT’s, Google Sheet files will be uploaded there for quick access of participants. This Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course is valid for 60 Days.

Click Here to Enroll for Google Sheet Course

Click Here to Enroll for Microsoft Powerpoint & Google sheet

Who is Eligible to Join Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course:

There is no bound on the eligibility from our side for Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course. Any person who wants to learn and master in Google Sheet can join this course. However, it will be more beneficial for the below-mentioned persons:

 

⭐Commerce Graduates/CA/CS/CMA/Law students

⭐Tax professionals whether in JOB or Practice

⭐Qualified CA/CS/CMA/LLB

⭐Semi-qualified CA/CS/CMA working in CA Firms or in Industry

⭐Any other person not covered above can join course if interested.

Course Duration:

The course duration is around 4 hours.

Certificate:

A Certificate of Participation from the Studycafe will be provided on completion of the Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course.

Views Limitation:

This is a Completely online course, no bar on the number of views. During 60 days you can access this Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course from anywhere at any time with unlimited views.

Course Start Date:

Google Sheet Basic to Advance Online Certification Course is starting from Sep 02, 2021 and will be completed on Sep 03, 2021.

Course Timing:

Timing: 07:00 PM to 09:00 PM.

Click Here to Enroll for Google Sheet Course

Click Here to Enroll for Microsoft Powerpoint & Google sheet



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3jyJmaA

Petition filed in the SC urging the ICAI to Conduct a Back-up Exam for students who Opted Out

Petition filed in the SC urging the ICAI to Conduct a Back-up Exam for students who Opted Out

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has been asked to conduct a back-up exam for individuals who opted out, according to a plea filed in the Supreme Court.

The application was submitted by CA students through Advocate Prashant Bhushan, who stated that the Supreme Court has ordered a backup exam to be held for those candidates who may be unable to compete in the July 2021 CA exams, in order to ensure that no applicant suffers as a result of COVID-19.

The applicant claims that the ICAI’s announcement violates the spirit of the Supreme Court’s judgement because, rather than providing an alternative option, it has scheduled the Main examination for November 2021, when the exam is generally held as a backup. As a result, the candidates are effectively denied an alternative option, as the Court has ordered.

It was also stated that the ICAI had administered the November 2020 examinations in two cycles, November 2020 and January 2021, the previous year. As a result, ICAI should conduct the tests in two cycles again this year, the first in July 2021 and the second in the months leading up to November 2021, so that COVID-19 impacted candidates do not forfeit their November 2021 attempt.

A three-judge bench of Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, and Justice JK Maheshwari adjourned for one week a petition filed by candidates who had opted out of the July 2021 attempt, requesting that the ICAI conduct a back-up exam or second cycle of the July 2021 attempt before November 2021 for those who had opted out of the July 2021 attempt.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3t0dejx

Reopening of assessment valid after Inquiry suggests the Assessee is beneficiary of Accommodation Entry

Reopening of assessment valid after Inquiry suggests the Assessee is beneficiary of Accommodation Entry

In Bharatkumar Kalubhai Ghadiya v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(3) [R/Special Civil Application No. 7743 of 2021 dated August 19, 2021], Bharatkumar Kalubhai Ghadiya (“the Petitioner”) has filed the current petition seeking to quash Notice dated March 18, 2020 by Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(3) (“the Respondent”) wherein the Respondent believes that the Petitioner has escaped assessment of Income Tax chargeable under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”).

There was a reopening by the Assessing Officer (“the AO”) of the assessment of Income tax Returns filed by the Petitioner on March 17, 2021 under Section 148 of the IT Act. The Petitioner raised legal and factual objections against the reopening before the Respondents, the same being disposed of vide Order dated May 10, 2021 holding the reopening was justified and valid. The Petitioner therefore has filed the petition granting interim relief for the same.

The Petitioner contended that the reopening is based upon change of opinion due to the information received by the Respondent after passing of the Assessment Order. Further contended that statement made by a tainted party cannot be made a reason to believe that the Income chargeable has escaped Assessment. The same should be believed based on tangible material and act which lacks in the current case.

The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court observed that it cannot be said that there is no reason to believe that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. The exercise of reopening has only been made after due inquiries and recording of statements of concerned persons and notice has only been issued after finding prima facie material.

Held, no procedural lapse and/or deviation from procedure prescribed in reopening and the reasons recorded do not lack validity as necessary approvals from the competent authority appear to have been received.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3t1vdG8

Supreme Court modifies High Court’s Order by granting appropriate authority to issue fresh SCN

Supreme Court modifies High Court’s Order by granting appropriate authority to issue fresh SCN

In the State of Jharkhand and Ors. v. M/s. Bihar Sponge Iron Ltd. [IA No. 20324/2021 – Exemption from filing O.T dated August 9, 2021], the current appeal has been filed against the Order SLP(C)No. 14956 of 2020 dated October 23, 2019 by the Hon’ble Jharkhand HIgh Court (“Jharkhand HC”) which quashed the Show Cause Notice (“SCN”) on the grounds of it violating Section 70(5)(b) of Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (“JVAT Act”) and not being in conformity with the provisions of it.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court allowing the current appeal by the Revenue observed that the contention put forth by M/s. Bihar Sponge Iron Ltd. (“the Respondent”) that the Jharkhand HC decided the matter in favour of Respondents was not correct. The Apex Court noted that the contention is based upon incorrect reading of the Jharkhand HC’s Order, observing that the judgment revolved around the factum of validity of the SCN, not more and not less.

Modifying the judgment put forth by the HC, the Supreme Court held that the HC should have kept the option open to the competent authority to issue a fresh SCN in conformity with the provisions of the JVAT Act and Rules.

Thus, directed the appropriate authority to issue a fresh SCN while being in continuation with action initiated in the Original SCN.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3t3zGbe

Tripura HC directed revenue to release the vehicle detained due to expiry of E-way bill due to unforeseen circumstances

Tripura HC directed revenue to release the vehicle detained due to expiry of E-way bill due to unforeseen circumstances

In NE Equipment Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Tripura and others [WP(C) No. 577/2021] dated August 24, 2021 the Hon’ble Tripura High Court directed the Respondents to release the transport vehicle and machinery upon the Petitioner filing an undertaking that, if any tax or penalty liability is crystallized upon final assessment, the Petitioner shall deposit the same with the Government revenue.

Facts:

NE Equipment Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) sold one TATA Hitachi Hydraulic Excavator Model No. EX 210 LC to one Satya Sundar Das of Khowai. The cost of machinery was Rs.49,66,102/- on which IGST of Rs.8,93,898/- was collected from the purchaser and duly declared in the sale invoices.

The machinery was being transported in a truck trailer and started its journey from Silchar. When the transport vehicle reached at Churaibari check post, the transport department of State of Tripura detained the vehicle on the ground that the excavator had no registration in the State of Tripura which was violative of Section 192A of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Eventually the transport authority released the order of detention against the Petitioner paying fine of Rs.10,000/-. In the meantime, however, the validity of the e-way bill had expired. The vehicle was now intercepted by the GST authorities at Churaibari check post on the ground that the driver did not have valid e-way bill.

The Superintendent of Taxes, Churaibari Enforcement Wing issued a show cause notice to the Petitioner under section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 calling upon the Petitioner as to why unpaid tax with penalty totaling to Rs.17,87,796/- should not be recovered from the Petitioner. At that stage, the Petitioner has approached the Hon’ble Tripura High Court primarily for release of the machinery.

Held:

The Hon’ble Tripura High Court in WP(C) No. 577/2021 dated August 24, 2021 directed the Respondents to release the transport vehicle and the machinery upon the Petitioner filing an undertaking before this Court to the effect that, if any tax or penalty liability is crystallized upon final assessment subject to right of appeal and further challenge, the Petitioner shall deposit the same with the Government revenue.

The above ruling was based on following observations:

  • The validity expired on account of unforeseen and unexpected delay in crossing the check post since the transport department stopped the movement of the vehicle on the ground that the machinery was not registered in the State of Tripura.
  • Allowing the department to detain the machinery would be wholly impermissible. The fault of the Petitioner if at all is rather technical.
  • The machinery costs nearly half a crore of rupees on which the Government revenue has already earned substantial tax. Detaining such machinery at the check post would expose it to deterioration particularly in the present season of heavy rainfall.
  • The Petitioner’s projects and works which must be in pipeline would also suffer.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2WFQDwh

SC dismissed SLP citing an alternative remedy of Appeal against Assessment Order

SC dismissed SLP citing an alternative remedy of Appeal against Assessment Order

In M/s Siddhi Vinayak Trading Company V. Union of India & Ors. [Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.11071/2021] dated July 26, 2021 the Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition (“the SLP”) as alternative remedy of appeal against the Assessment order is available with the Petitioner.

Facts:

Earlier, M/s Siddhi Vinayak Trading Company (“the Petitioner”) filed writ petition before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court seeking to quash of Revenue’s order, as the initiation of the proceeding and summon were issued under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) was made by Central Tax Authority and adjudication is made by State Tax Authority.

The High Court observed that the initiation of the proceeding for imposition of tax and penalty was with the issuance of the notice under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the UPGST Act”) and the inquiry under Section 70 of the CGST Act was independent. Subsequently, the High Court dismissed the petition.

Aggrieved with the decision of Allahabad High Court, the petitioner is before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the High Court decision.

Held:

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.11071/2021] dated July 26, 2021 held as under:

  • Since an appeal lies under Section 107 of the UPGST Act against the order of assessment, we are not entertaining the SLP.
  • It is open to the Petitioners to pursue the alternative remedy keeping all the rights and contentions of the parties open.
  • Supreme Court dismissed the Appeal

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3BncNCA

Non-Adherence of SCN under Section 144B invalidates Faceless Assessment

Non-Adherence of SCN under Section 144B invalidates Faceless Assessment

In Piramal Enterprises Limited v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax/Income-tax Officer National e-Assessment Centre and Others [Writ Petition (L) No .11040 OF 2021 dated July 30, 2021], Piramal Enterprises Limited (“the Petitioner”) has filed the current petition being aggrieved by the Draft Assessment Order dated April 22, 2021 under Faceless Assessment System/E- Assessment.

The Petitioner received a draft assessment order under section 144C(1) read with 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”) disallowing sum of Rs.167.57 crore under section 14A of the IT Act,. The order rejected the submissions of the petitioner stating that burden to reconcile the data with the service tax returns was on the petitioner and holding that request for further time to be given for reconciliation is not justifiable.

The Revenue contended that there was a substantial difference between the value of gross receipts from services shown in service tax return received from Central Board of Excise and Customs (“CBEC”) and values disclosed in income tax return which are significantly less in income tax return. While the Petitioner was asked to reconcile the difference between the two, it was expected that the Petitioner would reconcile figures with its own books of accounts, the Petitioner has failed to do the same.

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court after analyzing the provisions of Section 144B of the IT Act, observed, the “Legislature is not unwary of situations arising, requiring personal hearing and oral submissions and thus, has provided for the same under the faceless assessment scheme under section 144B. It emerges that where response is given by the assessee to show-cause notice, the process under sub-section (7) would follow.”

Held that assessment made under Section 143(3) of the IT Act vide Order dated April 22, 2021 was non est u/s 144B(9) of the IT Act because it did not adhere with the procedure laid down under Section 144B(1) and under Section 144B(7)(vii) of the IT Act. Also added that the principle of natural justice firmly runs through the fabric of section 144B(1) of the IT Act.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2WI6KtR

Delhi HC : IT Software should have been tested prior in time on a sufficiently large sample base of assessees before it is launched for public at large

Delhi HC : IT Software should have been tested prior in time on a sufficiently large sample base of assessees before it is launched for public at large

In Krishan Agarwal Vs. PCIT [W.P.(C) 3459/2021 & C.M.No.10489/2021, W.P.(C) 8371/2021& C.M.No.25917/2021, W.P.(C) 5513/2021, W.P.(C) 5583/2021 & CM APPL. 17357/2021 dated August 27, 2021], the Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide Order 3459/ 2021 and 8371/2021 had observed that technology should be used to ease and facilitate transactions and not become a basis for harassing an assessee by asking him to repeatedly file unnecessary and irrelevant forms. It directed the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) (“DGIT (Systems)”) to modify the software of filing returns accordingly.

In pursuance of the above-mentioned orders, DGIT(Systems) joined the proceedings in the current listed order wherein the Hon’ble Delhi High Court heard petitions while taking into account the contention put forth by DGIT (Systems) which pleaded that it is making the best effort to resolve the software issues flagged in the impugned orders. Added that the Assessing Officer (“the AO”) books a ticket in the occurrence of issues raised in the computer programme or software which is then either resolved or sent to another vertical.

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court thereby observed that the public at large should only be asked to use the software after it has been “tested prior in time on a sufficiently large sample base of assessees”. Programme should be made flexible enough to incorporate the implementation of the Court’s orders.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3kCcJbD

ESI Applicability and Contribution Limits For F.Y 2021-22

ESI Applicability and Contribution Limits For F.Y 2021-22

What Is ESI? Employees’ State Insurance (abbreviated as ESI) is a public social security and health insurance fund for Indian workers/employees. It involves contributions both from the employer and employee. It is managed by the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) according to rules and regulations stipulated in the Specified Act i.e. ESI Act 1948.ESIC is a Statutory and an Autonomous Body under the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India.

Applicability:

As per section 2(12) It is applicable to all non-seasonal factories having 10 or more employees.. It also covers the establishments that are covered under the Factory Act and Shops and Establishments as defined in the Act.

Note:

The scheme under the ESI Act 1948 also covers Shops, Hotels, Restaurants, , Cinema including preview theatres, Newspaper establishments etc .employing 20/10 or more Persons where Central /State Govt. is the appropriate Govt.

Limit:

The limit is applicable to those establishments  having 10 or more employees who draws a monthly wages up to Rs. 21,000 earlier it was 15,000(Rs.25,000 if the Person is disable) has to mandatorily register itself with the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation(ESIC ) and provide the ESI benefits to its employees.

Rate:

The rates of contribution are revised from time to time. Currently, the employee’s contribution rate is 0.75% (Earlier it was 1.75%) of the wages and that of employer’s is 3.25% (Earlier it was 4.75%) of the wages paid/payable in respect of the employees in every wage period effective from 01.07.2019.

Contribution Period and Benefit Period:

There are two contribution periods each of six months duration and two corresponding benefit periods i.e. also of six months duration as mentioned in below table:

Contribution Period Cash Benefit Period
1st April to 30th Sept. 1st Jan of the following year to 30th June.
1st Oct to 31st March of the year following. 1st July to 31st December.

Illustration: Let us Suppose Mr. A Working with wages of Rs.20,000 works in a establishment on which ESI Act 1948 applicable.

Then contribution will be calculated as mentioned below:

Employee Contribution –20,000*0.75% = 150

Employer Contribution –20,000*3.25% = 650

Here , Total contribution will be made of Rs.800.

Time Limit:

Every employer who deducts the ESI amount (including Employee’s and Employer’s contribution) must deposit the amount to the ESIC within 15 days from the last day of the Calendar month in which the contributions is made. The ESIC has authorized designated branches of the State Bank of India and some other banks to receive the payments on behalf of ESIC.

Disclaimer: This information is shared by author only for knowledge purposes. In no event the author shall be liable for any direct, indirect, special, or incidental damage resulting from or arising out of or in connection with the use of this information.

Compiled By: CA Amrish Aggarwal

Email Id: Amrish.aggarwal 001@gmail.com



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3gM3lAW

iPad is not a Computer; Not Eligible for Higher Dep as per Income Tax: ITAT

iPad is not a Computer; Not Eligible for Higher Dep as per Income Tax: ITAT

View of Honorable ITAT

  • Although iPad may perform some computer operations, its primary aim is to communicate rather than to compute, since its key features include email, WhatsApp, Facetime calls, calls, music, films, and so on.
  • In our opinion, the iPad is not a replacement for a computer or laptop, which has a variety of utilities and functions, albeit some of these functions may be shared with the iPad.
  • In popular language, the iPad is seen as a communication device with some computer features, and the Apple Store does not sell the iPad as a computer device, but rather as a communication/entertainment device.
  • Another reason for considering the iPad to be a communication device is that it has an IMEA number.
  • Thus the Tribunal ruled that the iPad is not a computer, and so low-rate depreciation i.e. 15% and not 40% is appropriate.

The Order is given below for referance.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3gJTU4T

GST not leviable on amount collected from employees for canteen charges

GST not leviable on amount collected from employees for canteen charges

2021 dated July 30, 2021 held that, no GST is leviable on amount representing the employees portion of canteen charges, which is collected by the employer and paid to the canteen service provider.

Facts:

M/S Tata Motors Ltd. (“the Applicant”) is maintaining canteen facility for its employees at their factory premises to comply with the mandatory requirement of maintaining the canteen as per the Factories Act, 1948.

The Applicant is recovering nominal amount on monthly basis to ensure use of canteen facility only by authorized persons/employees and expenditure incurred towards canteen facility borne by the Applicant is part and parcel of cost to company. In press release dated 10.07.2017 also, it was clarified that, supply by employer to employee in terms of contractual agreement of employment (part of salary/CTC) is not subject to GST.

Question on which Advance Ruling sought:

The Applicant is before AAR Gujarat to seek answer of the following questions:

1. Whether input tax credit (ITC) available to Applicant on GST charged by service provider on canteen facility provided to employees working in factory?

2. Whether GST is applicable on nominal amount recovered by Applicants from employees for usage of canteen facility?

3. If ITC is available as per question no. (1) above, whether it will be restricted to the extent of cost borne by the Applicant (employer)?

Held:

The AAR Gujarat vide Ruling no. GUJ/GAAR/R/39/2021 dated July 30, 2021 held as under:

(i) Section 17(5)(b)(i) ends with colon (:) and is followed by a proviso and this proviso ends with a semi colon (;)

(ii) Colons and semicolons are two types of punctuation. Colons are used in sentences to show that something is following, like a quotation, example, or list. Semicolons are used to join two independent clauses/ sub-clauses, or two complete thoughts that could stand alone as complete sentences. That means they’re to be used when you’re dealing with two complete thoughts that could stand alone as a sentence.

(iii) Section 17(5)(b)(i) sub-clause ending with a colon and followed by a proviso which ends with a semi colon is to be read as independent sub-clause, independent of sub clause Section 17(5)(b)(iii) and its proviso [of sub-clause iii]. Thereby, the proviso to section 17(5)(b)(iii) is not connected to the sub-clause of Section 17(5)(b)(i) and cannot be read into it.

(iv) On the basis of above observations, it is ruled that:

a. ITC on GST paid on canteen facility is blocked credit under section 17 (5)(b)(i) of CGST Act and inadmissible to applicant.

b. GST, at the hands on the applicant, is not leviable on the amount representing the employees’ portion of canteen charges, which is collected by the Applicant from employees and paid to the canteen service provider.

Section 17(5)(b) is reproduced herein below:

“(b) the following supply of goods or services or both-

(i) food and beverages, outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, leasing, renting or hiring of motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) except when used for the purposes specified therein, life insurance and health insurance:

Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available where an inward supply of such goods or services or both is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply;

(ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre; and

(iii) travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as leave or home travel concession:

Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available, where it is obligatory for an employer to provide the same to its employees under any law for the time being in force.”

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3kDVhmY

Appeal can’t be dismissed for want of certified copy of order appealed against

Appeal can’t be dismissed for want of certified copy of order appealed against

In Re Shree Jagannath Traders v. Commissioner of State Tax Odisha, Cuttack [W.P.(C) NO.15061 OF 2021 dated June 07, 2021] the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa held that, mere delay in enclosing a certified copy of order appealed against along with the appeal should not be considered for rejecting the Appeal.

Facts:

M/s Shree Jagannath Traders (“the Assessee”/ “the Petitioner”) filed appeal against and order of adjudicating authority before Appellate Authority within time, electronically accompanied by a downloaded copy of order appealed against. Further, it was not accompanied by the certified copy thereof at that stage since the Lawyer who had filed the appeal was in self quarantine as he had come into contact with a client who had tested positive for Covid-19.

The Appellate Authority dismissed the Assessee ’s appeal on the ground that appeal was not presented within time.

Issue:

The Assessee filed the writ before Hon’ble High Court of Orissa seeking whether the Appellate Authority was justified in dismissing the Petitioner’s appeal, on the grounds that the appeal was not presented within the time prescribed under law?

Held:

The Hon’ble High Court of Orissa in W.P.(C) NO.15061 OF 2021 dated June 07, 2021 held as under:

a. The explanation offered by the petitioner is a plausible and not an unreasonable one, especially in these Covid times, and further considering that a downloaded copy thereof was in fact submitted along with the appeal which was otherwise filed within time

b. Mere delay in enclosing a certified copy of order appealed against, along with the appeal should not come in the way of the Petitioner’s appeal for being considered on merits by the Appellate Authority.

c. This is a case of substantial compliance and the interests of justice ought not to be constrained by a hyper technical view of the requirement that a certified copy of the order appealed against should be submitted within one week of the filing of the appeal.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2V5us2q

GST Work required to be done before 30th Sep 2021

GST Work required to be done in your books before 30th Sep 2021

We all are thoroughly conscious of the significance of September monthly GST returns for any Financial Year. This is the last month to make corrections in GST returns regarding income or purchases. As we’re stepping into September certain work should be done in your books related to GST returns for the FY 2020-21. Below are the summarized points:

Amending/Adding Outward Supply.

  • If you have made any errors in declaring outward supplies for FY 2020-21, please update sales invoices in Return of Sep 2021.
  • Similarly, if you have missed declaring outward supplies for FY 2020-21, please declare the same in the Return for the month of Sep 2021.
  • Please note that interest @18% is applicable in case you have delayed in declaring Tax Liability.

Please note that once this period lapses, you can Declare the excess Tax Liability by filing DRC-03.

Claiming ITC of invoices of FY 2020-21

  • If you did not disclose eligible purchases in GSTR-3B for FY 2020-21, now is the right and last time to claim ITC on same.
  • If ineligible ITC has been claimed, please make ITC reversals.
  • If payment to the vendor has not been made within 180 days, please make ITC reversals.
  • Please note that interest @18% is applicable in case of reversal of ITC

Please note that once this period lapses, you can reverse the ineligible ITC by filing DRC-03. Please also note that unclaimed eligible ITC cannot be claimed, once this period lapses.

Reconciliation B/W Books and GST Returns

Books and GST returns must be reconciled. It’s crucial to do a reconciliation to find any problems or omissions in the GST returns you’ve filed.

  • Reconcile Books vs. GSTR 3B vs. GSTR-1 for supplies.
  • Reconcile Books vs. GSTR 3B vs. GSTR-2A for inward supply.
  • Please encourage vendors to declare pending invoices in their GSTR-1 as soon as possible. Otherwise, ITC will be lost.


from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3kHFCmA

Monday, August 30, 2021

Cancellation and Revocation of Cancellation of GST Registration

Cancellation and Revocation of Cancellation of GST Registration

Cancellation of Registration under GST means that the registered person will no more be registered under GST. The provisions regarding cancellation of registration is stated under section 29 of CGST Act, 2017.

The proper officer may, either on his own motion, or on an application filed by the registered person, or by his legal heirs (in case of death of such person), cancel the registration, in such manner and within such period as may be prescribed, cancel the registration, in such manner and within such period as may be prescribed.

Procedure to be followed by the registered person seeking cancellation of registration

As per Rule 20 of CGST Rules, 2017, a registered person other than:-

  • A person to whom a registration has been granted under Rule 12 i.e. tax deductor or tax collector, or
  • A person to whom a Unique Identity Number has been granted under Rule 17,

Seeking cancellation of his registration shall electronically submit an application in Form GST REG-16, including therein,:-

  • The details of inputs held in stock or inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock, and of capital goods held in stock on the date from which the cancellation of registration is sought,
  • Liability thereon,
  • The details of the payment, if any, made against such liability, and

may furnish, along with the application, relevant documents in support thereof, at the common portal, within a period of 30 days of the occurrence of event warranting the cancellation, either directly or through a Facilitation Center notified by the commissioner.

Procedure to be followed by the Proper officer for cancellation of registration

Rule 22 of the CGST Act, 2017 lays down the procedure to be followed by the proper officer for cancellation of registration. According, the procedure has been described as follows:-

1. Show cause notice (SCN) for cancellation of registration: Where the proper officer has reasons to believe that the registration of a person is liable to be canceled, he shall issue a notice to such person in Form GST REG-17, requiring him to show cause, within a period of 7 working days from the date of service of such notice, as to why his registration shall not be canceled.

2. Reply to SCN: The reply to the show-cause notice shall be furnished in Form GST REG-18 within 7 working days from the date of service of notice.

3. Order for cancellation of Registration: Where registration of a person is liable to be canceled, the proper officer shall issue the order of cancellation of registration within 30 days from the date of reply to SCN, in Form GST REG-19.

4. Effective date of cancellation: The cancellation of registration shall be effective from a date to be determined by the proper officer and mentioned in the cancellation order.
He will direct the taxable person to pay arrears of any tax, interest, or penalty including the amount liable to be paid under section 29(5).

5. Dropping of proceedings for cancellation of Registration: If the reply to SCN is satisfactory, the proper officer shall drop the proceedings and pass an order in Form GST REG-20. However, where the person instead of replying to the SCN served for failure to furnish returns for a continuous period of 6 months (3 months in case of composition scheme supplier)furnishes all the pending returns and makes full payment of the tax dues along with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer shall drop the proceedings and pass an order.

Concept of final return

A taxable person whose GST registration is canceled or surrendered has to file a final return in the form of GSTR-10, within three months from the date of cancellation or date of cancellation order whichever is later, for the purpose of providing details of ITC involved in closing stock (including inputs and capital goods) to be reversed/ paid by the taxpayer.

Other points to be noted

  • A person to whom a UIN has been granted under rule 17 cannot apply for cancellation of registration [Rule 20].
  • The cancellation of registration will not affect the liability of the registered person to pay tax and other dues under the Act for any period prior to the date of cancellation.
  • The cancellation of registration under either SGST Act/UTGST Act shall be deemed to be a cancellation of registration under CGST Act [Section 29(4)].
  • Once registration is canceled by the tax authority, the taxpayer will be intimated about the same via message and email. Order for cancellation of registration will be issued and intimated to the primary authorized signatory by email and message.
  • The taxpayer would not be allowed to file a return for the period after the date of cancellation mentioned in the cancellation order. However, he can submit returns of the earlier period (i.e. for the period before the date of cancellation mentioned in the cancellation order for which registration was active).

Amount payable on cancellation of registration [Section 29(5) & (6)]

A registered person whose registration is canceled will have to debit the electronic credit or cash ledger by an amount equivalent to:-

  • input tax credit (ITC) in respect of:-
    (i) stock of inputs and inputs contained in semi-finished/finished goods’ stock or
    (ii) capital goods or plant and machinery on the day immediately preceding the date of cancellation, or
  • the output tax payable on such goods

whichever is higher, calculated in such manner as may be prescribed.

However, in case of capital goods or plant and machinery, the taxable person shall pay an amount equal to the input tax credit taken on the said capital goods or plant and machinery, reduced by such percentage points as may be prescribed or the tax on the transaction value of such capital goods or plant and machinery under section 15, whichever is higher.

The manner of determination of amount of credit to be reversed is prescribed under rule 44 of the CGST Rules, 2017.

Revocation of cancellation of registration [Section 30 read with rule 23]

Revocation of cancellation of registration under GST simply means the restoration of GST registration. The following procedures has been laid down in this regard:-

(A) Procedure for revocation of cancellation

  • Where the registration of a person is cancelled suo-motu by the proper officer, such registered person may apply for revocation of the cancellation to such proper officer, within 30 days from the date of service of the order of cancellation of registration, in Form GST REG-21.
  • Provided that the period of 30 days may be increased by:
    • the Additional Commissioner or the Joint Commissioner, as the case may be, for a period not exceeding 30 days
    • and the Commissioner, for a further period not exceeding 30 days
  • If the proper officer is satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for revocation of cancellation, he may revoke the cancellation of registration, by an order, in Form GST REG-22, within 30 days of receipt of application and communicate the same to applicant, otherwise, he may reject the revocation application by an order in Form GST REG- 05.
  • However, before rejecting the application, he has to first issue SCN in Form GST REG- 23 to the applicant who shall furnish the clarification within 7 working days of service of SCN. The proper officer shall dispose the application (accept/reject the same) within 30 days of receipt of clarification.

(B) Where registration was cancelled for failure of registered person to furnish returns

Where registration was cancelled for failure of registered person to furnish returns, before applying for revocation, the person has to make good the defaults, i.e. the person needs to file such returns.

However, the registration may have been cancelled by the proper officer either from the date of order of cancellation of registration or from a retrospective date.

(1) Where the registration has been canceled with effect from the date of order of cancellation of registration

The common portal does not allow furnishing of returns after the effective date of cancellation, but returns for the earlier period (i.e. for the period before date of cancellation mentioned in the cancellation order) can be furnished after cancellation.

Where the registration is cancelled with effect from the date of order of cancellation of registration, person applying for revocation of cancellation has to furnish all returns due till the date of such cancellation before the application for revocation can be filed and has to pay any amount due as tax, in terms of such returns along with any amount payable towards interest, penalties or late fee payable in respect of the said returns.

However, since the portal does not allow to furnish returns after the date of cancellation of registration, all returns due for the period from the date of order of cancellation till the date of order of revocation of cancellation of registration have to be furnished within a period of 30 days from the date of the order of revocation.

(2) Where the registration has been cancelled with retrospective Effect

Where the registration has been canceled with retrospective effect, it is not possible to furnish the returns before filing the application for revocation of cancellation of registration. In that case, the application for revocation of cancellation of registration is allowed to be filed, subject to the condition that all returns relating to the period from the effective date of cancellation of registration till the date of order of revocation of cancellation of registration shall be filed within a period of 30 days from the date of order of such revocation of cancellation of registration.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3gKGbuS

Capital gain in a capital gain A/C scheme that remained unutilized after the statutory time was to be taxed: ITAT

Capital gain in a capital gain A/C scheme that remained unutilized after the statutory time was to be taxed: ITAT

During the assessment proceedings for the year 2012-13, it was discovered that the assessee had sold a flat in 2008-09 and earned long-term capital gain, which he deposited in a capital gain account, and out of this amount of capital gain, assessee had invested part of the amount in a new project within 36 months, and assessee had filed his return without offering unutilized capital gain to tax.

Assessee’s Argument

According to the taxpayer, Builder was required to hand over the unit to the him within 36 months of signing the contract with him. All of the builder’s instalments, totaling Rs.35.10 lakhs, were paid directly from the capital gain account. But, Because the builder failed to complete the flat on time and did not give possession, the remaining cash of Rs. 14.9 Lakh was withheld while the case was being heard by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Taxpayer submitted that the amount of Rs.14,90,000/- was lying in the capital gain account. Referring to the provisions of sections 54 and 54F of the IT Act, 1961,he submitted that these provisions should be construed liberally. Referring to the following decisions, he submitted that merely because the assessee could not obtain the possession of the property within a period of 36 months due to defaults committed by the builder, the assessee should not be penalized and deduction u/s 54 should not be denied.

Judgment

  • The advantage of section 54/54F was permitted in all decisions where there was a delay in handing over the apartments to the assessees concerned where full or significant payments were made and there was no non-payment from the capital gain account within the statutory term in none of the situations.
  • In this situation, the assessee did not use the amount in the capital gain account within the statutory term and therefore the sum is subject to tax.


from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3jskD7Z

Join 3 Days Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA

Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA

In our continuous endeavor to empower more and more finance professionals, Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA has been designed for you. Detailed 3 Days course has been designed where daily more than 2 hrs sessions have been organized. This Course contains Videos along with study material, Files. Live training on SAP will be given.

How I will get the course:

This is an online Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA so there will not be any physical delivery of the lectures. After the purchase of the Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA, you can see the Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA under my account option under Dashboard. All the videos, study materials, PDF files, PPT’s, SAP files will be uploaded there for quick access of participants. This Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA is valid for 60 Days.

Who is Eligible to Join Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA:

There is no bound on the eligibility from our side for the Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA. Any person who wants to learn and master SAP can join this course. However, it will be more beneficial for the below-mentioned persons:

⭐Commerce Graduates/CA/CS/CMA/Law students

⭐Accounting professionals whether in JOB or Practice

⭐Qualified CA/CS/CMA/LLB

⭐Semi-qualified CA/CS/CMA working in CA Firms or in Industry

⭐Finance Professional and any other person not covered above can join the course if interested.

Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA Duration:

The course duration is 3 Days and around 6+ hours.

Certificate:

A Certificate of Participation from Studycafe will be provided on completion of the Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA.

Views Limitation:

This is a Completely online course, no bar on the number of views. During 60 days you can access this Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA from anywhere at any time with unlimited views.

Course Start Date:

Certification Course on SAP S/4 HANA is starting from Sep 06, 2021 and will be completed on Sep 08, 2021.

Course Timing:

Timing: 07:00 PM to 09:00 PM

Click Here to Enroll for Course



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3t0ohsJ

1 Day Left to Join Microsoft PowerPoint Certificate Course

Microsoft PowerPoint Certificate Course

In our continuous endeavor to empower more and more finance professionals, this Microsoft Powerpoint certification course has been designed for you.  Detailed 2 Days course has been designed where daily more than 2 hrs sessions have been organized. This Course contains Videos along with study material, Powerpoint Files. Live training on Powerpoint will be given.

How I will get the course:

This is an online Powerpoint Certification course so there will not be any physical delivery of the lectures. After the purchase of the Powerpoint Certification course, you can see the Powerpoint Certification course under my account option under purchased courses. All the videos, study materials, PDF files, PPT’s, Powerpoint files will be uploaded there for quick access of participants. This Powerpoint Certification course is valid for 60 Days.
Click Here to Enroll for Microsoft Powerpoint

Click Here to Enroll for Microsoft Powerpoint & Google sheet

Who is Eligible to Join Powerpoint Certification Course:

There is no bound on the eligibility from our side for Powerpoint Certification Course. Any person who wants to learn and master in Powerpoint can join this course. However, it will be more beneficial for the below-mentioned persons:

 

⭐Commerce Graduates/CA/CS/CMA/Law students

 

⭐Tax professionals whether in JOB or Practice

 

⭐Qualified CA/CS/CMA/LLB

 

⭐Semi-qualified CA/CS/CMA working in CA Firms or in Industry

 

⭐Any other person not covered above can join course if interested.

Course Duration:

The course duration is around 12 hours.

Certificate:

A Certificate of Participation from the Studycafe will be provided on completion of the Powerpoint Certification course.

Views Limitation:

This is a Completely online course, no bar on the number of views. During 60 days you can access this Powerpoint Certification course from anywhere at any time with unlimited views.

Course Start Date:

Microsoft Powerpoint Certification Course is starting from Aug 31, 2021 and will be completed on Sep 01, 2021.

Course Timing:

Timing: 07:00 PM to 09:00 PM.

 

Click Here to Enroll for Microsoft Powerpoint

Click Here to Enroll for Microsoft Powerpoint & Google sheet



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/2WDGi3W

Taxpayers can now take benefit of amnesty scheme along with applying for revocation of canceled GSTN

Taxpayers can now take benefit of amnesty scheme along with applying for revocation of canceled GSTN

The government gave relief to taxpayers by decreasing / waiving the late fee for non-furnishing FORM GSTR-3B for the tax months July 2017 to April 2021 if the returns for these tax periods are filed between 01.06.2021 and 31.08.2021.

The deadline to apply for the late fee amnesty scheme has been extended from August 31, 2021 to November 30, 2021.

[Refer to Notification No. 33/2021 Central Tax dated August 29, 2021].

Based on the numerous representations received, the government has also extended the deadlines for filing an application for revocation of cancellation of registration to September 30, 2021, where the deadline for filing an application for revocation of cancellation of registration is between March 1, 2020 and August 31, 2021.

Only those registrations that have been cancelled under clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 29 of the CGST Act would be eligible for the extension.

[Refer to Notification No. 34/2021 Central Tax issued August 29, 2021].

For the period of 27.04.2021 to 31.08.2021, corporations can file FORM GSTR-3B and FORM GSTR-1/ IFF utilising an electronic verification code (EVC) instead of a Digital Signature Certificate (DSC). This has been extended till October 31, 2021.

[Refer to Notification No. 32/2021 Central Tax issued August 29, 2021].

The extension of the late fee amnesty scheme’s deadline and the time limit for filing an application for revocation of registration cancellation will benefit a large number of taxpayers, particularly small taxpayers, who were unable to file their returns on time for a variety of reasons, most notably the COVID-19 pandemic’s difficulties, and whose registrations were cancelled as a result.

Taxpayers are requested to avail the benefit of these extensions at the earliest to avoid last minute rush.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3kzxTam

SC approves Income Tax deduction of interest paid via debentures for tax calculation for bona fide transactions

SC approves Income Tax deduction of interest paid via debentures for tax calculation for bona fide transactions

Supreme Court approves deduction of interest paid via debentures for tax calculation under Sec 43B of Income Tax Act for bona fide transactions

Facts of the case:

  • MM Aqua Technologies was in default of the payment of principal and interest on loan from ICICI Bank. So, the two parties agreed that the interest be paid through issue of ‘debentures’ by the assessee to the lender. The assessee, after the conversion of interest into debentures, claimed the interest under Section 43B of the IT Act as paid.
  • The deduction of interest claimed by the company was disallowed by the assessing officer. However, it was allowed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as well as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The matter went to the Delhi High Court, which relied on the Explanation 3C to the section 43B (d) of the IT Act to disallow the deduction.

Legal provisions as per Income Tax Act:

  • Section 43B provides a list of expenses allowed as deduction under the head ‘Income from business and profession’. It states that some expenses can be claimed as deduction from business income only in the year of actual payment and not in the year when the liability to pay such expenses is incurred.
  • Sec 43B(d): Any sum payable by the assessee as interest on any loan or borrowing from any public financial institution or a State financial corporation or a State industrial investment corporation, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement governing such loan or borrowing,
  • Explanation 3C – For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that a deduction of any sum, being interest payable under clause (d) of this section, shall be allowed if such interest has been actually paid and any interest referred to in that clause which has been converted into a loan or borrowing shall not be deemed to have been actually paid.”

Why was Section 43B inserted?

Section 43B was originally inserted by the Finance Act, 1983 w.e.f. 1st April, 1984 after taking note of the fact that in several cases taxpayers were not discharging their statutory liability such as in respect of excise duty, employer’s contribution to provident fund, Employees State Insurance Scheme, etc., for long periods of time, extending sometimes to several years.

To curb this practice, the Finance Act inserted a new section 43B to provide that deduction for any sum payable by the assessee by way of tax or duty under any law for the time being in force or any sum payable by the assessee as an employer by way of contribution to any provident fund or superannuation fund or gratuity fund or any other fund for the welfare of employees shall irrespective of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred, be allowed only in computing the income of that previous year in which such sum is actually paid by the assessee.

Why was Explanation 3C inserted?

The Finance Act, 2006 inserted Explanation 3C w.e.f. 1st April, 1989 after it was brought to the notice of Income tax authorities that certain assessees were claiming deduction under section 43B on account of conversion of interest payable on an existing loan into a fresh loan on the ground that such conversion was a constructive discharge of interest liability and, therefore, amounted to actual payment. Claim of deduction against conversion of interest into a fresh loan is a case of misuse of the provisions of section 43B.

A new Explanation 3C was, therefore, inserted to clarify that if any sum payable by the assessee as interest on any loan or borrowing, referred to in clause (d) of section 43B, is converted into a loan or borrowing, the interest so converted, shall not be deemed to be actual payment.

Supreme Court ruling:

  • Supreme Court (SC) has allowed MM Aqua Technologies to deduct interest paid via issue of debentures from its income for the purpose of income tax calculation.
  • The court held that the interest was “actually paid” by the assessee through issuance of debentures, which has extinguished its liability to pay interest. To reach this conclusion, the court relied on the fact that the accounts of the bank reflected the amount received by way of debentures as its business income for the assessment year in question.
  • At the heart of the introduction of Explanation 3C to Sec 43B(d) is misuse of the provisions of Sec 43B by not actually paying but converting such interest into a fresh loan. Bona fide/ genuine transactions of actual payments are not meant to be affected.
  • Explanation 3C is “clarificatory” in nature, it explains Sec 43B (d) as it originally stood and does not purport to add a new condition retrospectively.
  • A retrospective provision in a tax act which is “for the removal of doubts” cannot be presumed to be retrospective, even where such language is used, if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood.

Impact of Supreme Court ruling:

  • The judgment could pave the way for corporates under stress in the current environment to restructure their interest payment as debentures or other instruments, and deduct the same for income tax purposes. This is provided the lender recognises such interest payment in its books and pays tax on it.

Sources of information:

  • Supreme Court Judgement: M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi dt 11 August, 2021
  • https://ift.tt/3onkJP5
  • https://ift.tt/2ACmYJr


from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3ys3Cz7

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Test the new Income Tax Portal before making it live for Public use: Delhi High Court

Test the new Income Tax Portal before making it live for Public use: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court said that the new Income Tax Software should first be tested on a sample basis, before making it useful for the public. The Court also added that Technology cannot be used as a basis for harassing assessees even as digitization is being implemented at a rapid pace and human interface is sought to be reduced by the Income-Tax Department.

In a hearing held on 26th Aug, the court had given instances of glitches and shortcomings in the computer program and software. The DGIT (systems) Pragya Saksena, who joined the proceedings on Friday, assured the court that the Directorate will be able to resolve the glitches and revert with solutions, if possible, within a fortnight.

The Court Further Directed the Income Tax Department to file the Status report within 2 Weeks.

Click on the below mentioned link to read the Order



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3gEritW

EVC based GST filing for companies extended till 31.10.2021

EVC based GST filing for companies extended till 31.10.2021

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs [CBIC] vide notification No. 32/2021 – Central Tax has extended the due date of Electronic Verification Code [EVC] based filing for filing GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for companies till 31.10.2021.

Originally Digital Signature Certificate or DSC is used for filing GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for companies. Amid COVID-19, this relief has been provided.

Notification is given below for reference:

 



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3mFWBbJ

GST Amnesty Scheme Extended upto 30th Nov 2021

GST Amnesty Scheme Extended upto 30th Nov 2021

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs [CBIC] vide notification No. 33/2021 – Central Tax has extended the due date of filing GSTR-3B in GST Amnesty Scheme upto 30th Nov 2021.

Please note that Time limit for filing revocation application for cancellation of GSTIN for period falling b/w 01.03.21 to 31.08.21 has also been extended to 30.09.2021. So now Taxpayers can take benefit of revocation application for cancellation of GSTIN along with GST Amnesty Scheme.

Download Notification from below link:



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3sZRyEe

Time limit for filing revocation application for cancellation of GSTIN for period falling b/w 01.03.21 to 31.08.21 extended to 30.09.2021

Time limit for filing revocation application for cancellation of GSTIN for period falling b/w 01.03.21 to 31.08.21 extended to 30.09.2021

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs [CBIC] vide notification No. 34/2021 – Central Tax has given the following relief:

The time limit for filing an application for revocation of cancellation of GST Numbers (GSTIN) in certain specific cases i.e. if cancellation is due to non-filing of returns, is extended till 30th September 2021. This extension is available if the time limit for making an application of revocation of cancellation of registration under sub-section (1) of section 30 of the said Act falls during the period from the 1st day of March 2020 to the 31st day of August 2021.

Please NOTE that Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs [CBIC] vide notification No. 33/2021 – Central Tax has extended the due date of filing GSTR-3B in GST Amnesty Scheme upto 30th Nov 2021. So now Taxpayers can take benefit of “revocation application for cancellation of GSTIN” along with GST Amnesty Scheme.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3Dtp3TV

CBDT Extends due date under Vivad se Vishwas Act

CBDT Extends due date under Vivad se Vishwas Act

Under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act 2020 (hereinafter referred to as “Vivad se Vishwas Act”), the amount payable by the declarant is stated in the table under section 3 of the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

As per the latest notification dated 25th June 2021, the last date of payment of the amount (without any additional amount) has been notified as 31st August 2021. Further the last date for payment of the amount (with additional amount) under Vivad se Vishwas Act has been notified as 31st October, 2021.

Considering the difficulties being faced in issuing and amending Form no 3, which is a prerequisite for making payment by the declarant under Vivad se Vishwas Act, it has been decided to extend the last date of payment of the amount (without any additional amount) to 30th September, 2021. Necessary notification to this effect shall be issued shortly.

It is, however, clarified that there is no proposal to change the last date for payment of the amount (with additional amount) under Vivad se Vishwas Act, which remains as 31st October, 2021.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3zs4m8J

CBDT Further Extends due of filing various Forms under Income Tax Act

CBDT Further Extends due of filing various Forms under Income Tax Act

Central Board of Direct Taxes [CBDT] has extended due dates for electronic filing of certain Forms under the Income Tax Act, 1961. These Extended due dates are as follows:

  1. The application for registration or intimation or approval under Section 10(23C), 12A, 35(1)(ii)/(iia)/(iii) or 80G of the Act in Form No. 10A required to be filed on or before 30th June, 2021, as extended to 31st August, 2021 vide Circular No.12 of 2021 dated 25.06.2021, may be filed on or before 31st March, 2022;
  2. The application for registration or approval under Section 10(23C), 12A or 80G of the Act in Form No.10AB, for which the last date for filing falls on or before 28th February, 2022 may be filed on or before 31st March, 2022;
  3. The Equalization Levy Statement in Form No.1 for the Financial Year 2020- 21, which was required to be filed on or before 30th June, 2021, as extended to 31st August, 2021 vide Circular No.15 of 2021 dated 03.08.2021, may be filed on or before 31st December, 2021;
  4. The Quarterly statement in Form No. 15CC to be furnished by authorized dealer in respect of remittances made for the quarter ending on 30th June, 2021, required to be furnished on or before 15th July, 2021 under Rule 37BB of the Rules, as extended to 31st August, 2021 vide Circular No.15 of 2021 dated 03.08.2021, may be furnished on or before 30th November, 2021;
  5. The Quarterly statement in Form No. 15CC to be furnished by authorized dealer in respect of remittances made for the quarter ending on 30th September, 2021, required to be furnished on or before 15th October, 2021 under Rule 37BB of the Rules, may be furnished on or before 31st December, 2021;
  6. Uploading of the declarations received from recipients in Form No. 15G/15H during the quarter ending 30th June, 2021, which was originally required to be uploaded on or before 15th July, 2021, and subsequently by 31st August, 2021, as per Circular No.12 of 2021 dated 25.06.2021, may be uploaded on or before 30th November, 2021;
  7. Uploading of the declarations received from recipients in Form No. 15G/15H during the quarter ending 30th September, 2021, which is required to be uploaded on or before 15th October, 2021, may be uploaded on or before 31st December, 2021;
  8. Intimation to be made by Sovereign Wealth Fund in respect of investments made by it in India in Form II SWF for the quarter ending on 30th June, 2021, required to be made on or before 31st July, 2021 as per Circular No.15 of 2020 dated 22.07.2020, as extended to 30th September, 2021 vide Circular No.15 of 2021 dated 03.08.2021, may be made on or before 30th November, 2021;
  9. Intimation to be made by Sovereign Wealth Fund in respect of investments made by it in India in Form II SWF for the quarter ending on 30th September, 2021, required to be made on or before 31st October, 2021 as per Circular No.15 of 2020 dated 22.07.2020, may be made on or before 31st December, 2021;
  10. Intimation to be made by a Pension Fund in respect of each investment made by it in India in Form No. 10BBB for the quarter ending on 30th June, 2021, required to be made on or before 31st July, 2021 under Rule 2DB of the Rules, as extended to 30th September, 2021 vide Circular No. 15 of 2021 dated 03.08.2021, may be made on or before 30th November, 2021;
  11. Intimation to be made by a Pension Fund in respect of each investment made by it in India in Form No. 10BBB for the quarter ending on 30th September, 2021, required to be made on or before 31st October, 2021 under Rule 2DB of the Rules, may be made on or before 31st December, 2021;
  12. Intimation by a constituent entity, resident in India, of an international group, the parent entity of which is not resident in India, for the purposes of sub-section (1) of section 286 of the Act, in Form No.3CEAC, required to be made on or before 30th November, 2021 under Rule 10DB of the Rules, may be made on or before 31st December, 2021;
  13. Report by a parent entity or an alternate reporting entity or any other constituent entity, resident in India, for the purposes of sub-section (2) or sub-section (4) of section 286 of the Act, in Form No. 3CEAD, required to be furnished on or before 30th November, 2021 under Rule 10DB of the Rules, may be furnished on or before 31st December, 2021;
  14. Intimation on behalf of an international group for the purposes of the proviso to sub-section (4) of section 286 of the Act in Form No. 3CEAE, required to be made on or before 30th November, 2021 under Rule 10DB of the Rules, may be made on or before 31st December, 2021


from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3kQ5xsD

Saturday, August 28, 2021

What is the role and responsibility of CA in the company

Chartered Accountant (CA) is one of the most demanding and high-paid jobs in India. The profession deals with finance and accounting

In India, the candidates must need to attend and pass a CA examination along with completing a specific training program to obtain that distinction.

Chartered Accountant work is a full-time in-office job, managing the accounting, finance, and budget for an organization, firm, or individuals.

With the responsibility of handles, multiple sectors, and practice as an independent contractor.

 

Chartered Accountants are the main financial advisors for almost every firm. The goal of these professionals is to accomplish a clearer picture of a client’s/ firm or organization’s financial situation.

In order to achieve it, they must be able to perform multiple tasks such as

 

  • The candidates must be able to provide trustworthy results efficiently with great accuracy.
  • As CA’s are working with large amounts of numerical data, by handling various tasks within deadlines.
  • Providing accurate and well-maintained reports to management.
  • CA must understand complex quantitative data, an honest detail-oriented, analytical thinker, and excellent presentation skills.

 

Let’s discuss some of the main roles and responsibilities of a Chartered Accountant.

 

  • Chartered Accountant Responsibilities:

Some of the key responsibility of a CA are mention as follows:

  • Financial regulations on all the company and organizational activities like local, state, and federal accounting.
  • Creating reports on financial data, compiling and analyzing the existing data.
  • Creating periodic reports like balance sheets, profit & loss statements, and others.
  • Maintaining financial records and sheets errorlessly.
  • Performing audits and resolving discrepancies.
  • Staying updated with the current law and regulations relating to finance and accounting.
  • Advising and assisting management in the various organizational decision-making processes by maintaining financial issues and preparing budgets.
  • Preparing and maintaining data to represent in front of important entities such as managers, potential investors, and others.

 

  • Requirements for becoming a Chartered Accountant:

The job of CA is a precise and professional level job. The eligibility criteria for attending and qualifying for a CA exam is quite specific with strict requirements

 

  • One of the basic requirements for becoming a CA is a Bachelor’s degree in Accounting or graduation in an accounting-related field.
  • There is more scope for PG completed candidates or with a good amount of work experience may be preferred.
  • issued licenses or certifications may be required.
  • A strong base of computer skills, analytical and communication skills required.
  • Great understanding of mathematics, accounting, and financial processes.
  • Attention to detail and decent professional behavior.

 

These are the main and essential qualities for becoming a successful Chartered Accountant career.

 

Contact Inside Tax the best CA firm in Delhi, for all types of income tax-related services. Get it done with the high accuracy of our experts. Get services like income tax returns, GST services, and corporate accounting.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3mGHIWH

ITR filing deadline for FY20-21 may have to be extended beyond Sept 30, 2021

ITR filing deadline for FY20-21 may have to be extended beyond Sept 30, 2021

The deadline for individuals to file an income tax return (ITR) for F.Y year 2020-2021 has been extended from the July 31st, 2021 deadline to September 30th, 2021. However, on the new Income Tax Portal, there are Malfunctions and other problems from the very beginning. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has asked Infosys to resolve all issues by September 15. However, this means that a person only has 15 days to submit an ITR before the due date, and a new and unfamiliar system is found to be challenging even for experienced chartered accountants. Many Chartered Accountants are also saying that in view of the status of the Income-tax filing portal, the deadline should be extended. Therefore, it seems likely that the deadline for ITR submissions due date will be extended.

Note that last year the government also extended the deadline for individuals to file ITR four times: the first time was from July 31 to November 30, 2020, then to December 31, 2020, and finally January 10, 2021.

Studycafe had word with Chartered Accountant Pratibha Goyal Partner of a Delhi-based Chartered Accountancy Firm she says: The deadline for ITR filing for individuals and entities Other than companies who do not need to get their accounts audited, is September 30, 2021. This should definitely be extended, as the new income tax portal still has many bugs in the last two and a half months. The response time of the portal is very slow. Also, the website has stopped supporting the loading of the 10 IE form, which is important for those who choose to be taxed under the new tax system governed by Section 115BAC of the Act. These flaws have not been resolved. We professionals, do not want to extend the filing date of tax returns over and over again, as this will increase our problems.

Additionally, considering the significant/multiple issues of the income tax portal that the government, income tax portal providers, and all stakeholders have witnessed, the only option left is to extend all deadlines in advance while ensures that faults are resolved quickly. This will lead to better compliance and restore trust in professionals and taxpayers.

Since the introduction of the new Income tax website, has had many technical problems, so taxpayers cannot submit income tax returns. The portal was unavailable for two days, August 21st and 22nd. In addition, the income tax portal is very slow and there are a lot of glitches on the Income tax website. Due to a technical glitch in the new income tax website, the income tax department may have to extend the deadline for filing income tax returns beyond September 2021. “



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3gIM37Y

All About Indian Trusts Act – Registration of trust, Formation & Taxation

All About Indian Trusts Act – Registration of trust, Formation & Taxation

A trust is a relationship in which a person or entity is bound by a fiduciary relationship to exercise that legal rights over the trust property for the benefits of any one or more individuals known as beneficiaries. The trust shall be governed by a set of written terms and conditions known as trust deed.

According to Section 3 of the Indian trust Act,1882, trust is defined as

An obligation annexed to the ownership of the property,

arising out of a confidence reposed in,

accepted by the owner, or declared and accepted by him,

for the benefits of another or of another and the owner.

TYPES OF TRUST

The trust has been broadly classified as

  1. Public trust: The trust which is created for the benefits of public at large or where the beneficiary is incapable of ascertainment is known as public trust. These trusts are essentially governed by charitable and religious trust act,1920, the religious endowments act, 1963, the societies  registration act,1860, etc. But not governed by Indian trust Act, 1882.
  2. Private trust: The trust created for the benefits of one or more individuals that can be particularly ascertained. These trusts are accustomed to act as per the provision of Indian trust Act, 1882.

WHO CAN FORM A TRUST

Any person who is competent to hold a property can form a trust. This may include

  • Company
  • Individuals
  • Association of persons
  • HUF
  • Legal guardian on behalf of the minor with permission of the civil court.

PROCEDURE OF CREATION OF A TRUST DEED

  • Creation of trust deed: To register a trust, proper deed should be created on a stamp paper of the expected value of the trust.
  • Submit the trust deed along with the photocopy of the deed to the local registrar for registration
  • At the time of registration, the settler and the two witness must be present along with the original identity proof.
  • The registrar retains the photocopy of the trust deed and returns the original registered copy of the trust deed.

DOCUMENTS  REQUIRED FOR REGISTERING THE TRUST DEED

  1. Aadhar and Pan card (original with the self attested copies)
  2. Water, Electricity bills with their own name if the property is self occupied
  3. Rent agreement along with NOC from the owner of the property in case of rented property
  4. Trust deed to be signed and submitted in sub registrar office under revenue department act of the concerned district court of respective area or district.

FILING FORM 12A

12A registration is granted by Income tax department to trust and other non  profit organisations for a period of 5 years which enable them to claim exemptions under income tax act over their surplus incomes. In order to claim exemption under 12A the trust should able to meet the definition of charitable purposes as defined in Income Tax Act, 1981

ESSENTIAL PARTICULARS OF TRUST DEED

A trust deed may be created using any language sufficient to show the intention. A trust deed should have

  1. Name of the trust
  2. Name of the author/ settler of the trust
  3. Name of the trustee
  4. Name of the beneficiary whether individual or public at large
  5. Objects and purpose of the trust
  6. Property that shall devolve
  7. Place of principal or other offices of the trust
  8. Procedure for appointment, removal or replacement of a trustee, their rights, duties and powers etc.
  9. Rights and duties of the beneficiaries
  10. Mode and methods of dissolution of trusts

 

BENEFITS OF FORMING A TRUST

  1. To avoid probate in substantial savings in time, legal fees and paper work
  2. Trust gives greater protection against a legal action who is unhappy with the dissolution of the trust property
  3. Reduces estate taxes which are to be paid while transferring property after death
  4. Trust can be used to claim exemption of any income that are arising out of profits and gains from business and professions
  5. Trust provides a greater confidentiality to the dissolution of property which can reduces the risks of inter family conflicts


from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3mEVfOe

Subsidy paid by Government is deductible for arriving at taxable value for chargeability of GST

Subsidy paid by Government is deductible for arriving at taxable value for chargeability of GST

In M/s. Greenbrilliance Renewable Energy LLP [ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/34/2021 dated July 30, 2021] M/s. Greenbrilliance Renewable Energy LLP (“the Applicant”) is a channel partner to execute the solar rooftop system in Gujarat under the Surya Gujarat Yojna (“SGY Scheme”), and has submitted that under SGY Scheme, beneficiaries can avail benefits of 40% subsidy on solar system cost upto 3KW and 20% subsidy of solar system cost for systems from 3KW-10KW.

The Applicant has sought clarification on the amount of subsidy to be reduced for arriving at taxable value of the solar system from the price declared by the Nodal Agency and whether the Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) liability would be on the taxable value calculated after subtracting the subsidy amount from the system price.

Further, the Applicant also seeks clarification on the implication of Section 17(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”) i.e. GST ITC reversal, if taxable value is derived after subtracting the subsidy amount from the system price.

The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling (“GAAR”) noted that with the information submitted by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam ltd (GUVNL), the authorized nodal agency for implementation of the scheme in the State, it can be inferred that the subsidy is given/borne by the Government and that, such portion borne by Government shall not be included in the value of the supply to arrive at the taxable value under Section 15(2)(e) of CGST Act.

Observed, the subject supply of the Applicant being a taxable supply, and that taxable value of the charging GST is arrived after subtracting subsidy, does not alter the nature of the supply. Therefore, it remains a taxable supply having no implication under Section 17(2) of the CGST Act.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/38lMhNE

Measures taken by the GOI on the fronts of FDI Policy Reforms resulted in increased FDI inflows into the country

Measures taken by the GOI on the fronts of FDI Policy Reforms resulted in increased FDI inflows into the country

Measures taken by the Government on the fronts of FDI policy reforms, investment facilitation and ease of doing business have resulted in increased FDI inflows into the country.

The following trends in India’s Foreign Direct Investment are an endorsement of its status as a preferred investment destination amongst global investors:

India has attracted total FDI inflow of US$ 22.53 billion during first three months of 2021-22, i.e. April, 2021 to June, 2021 which is 90% higher as compared to first three months of 2020-21 (US$ 11.84 billion).

  • FDI equity inflow grew by 168% in the first three months of F.Y. 2021-22 (US$ 17.57 billion) compared to the year ago period (US$ 6.56 billion).
  • ‘Automobile Industry’ has emerged as the top sector during the first three months of F.Y. 2021-22 with 27% share of the total FDI Equity inflow followed by Computer Software & Hardware (17%) and Services Sector (11%) respectively.
  • Under the sector `Automobile Industry’, majority of FDI Equity inflow (88%) was reported in the state of Karnataka during the first three months of the current financial year (2021-22).
  • Karnataka is the top recipient state during the F.Y. 2021-22 (upto June, 2021) with 48% share of the total FDI Equity inflows followed by Maharashtra (23%) and Delhi (11%).

*****



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3DntP5w

KSCAA urges Finance Minister to Rationalise Penalty provisions under Section 270AA of IT Act

KSCAA urges Finance Minister to Rationalise Penalty provisions under Section 270AA of IT Act

The Karnataka State Chartered Accountants Association(R) (in short ‘KSCAA’) urges Finance Minister to Rationalise Penalty provisions under Section 270AA of Income Tax Act. We would like to humbly submit to your good selves our representation highlighting suggestions on the rationalisation of Penalty Provisions u/s 270AA of Income Tax Act, 1961.

Below is the text of the Representation:

KARNATAKA STATE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION

21st August 2021

To,

Smt. Nirmala Sitaraman

Hon’ble Union Minister for Finance and Corporate Affairs

Government of India, North Block

New Delhi

Sub : Rationalisation of Penalty Provisions U/s 270AA of Income Tax Act, 1961

Respected Madam,

The Karnataka State Chartered Accountants Association(R) (in short ‘KSCAA’) is an Association of Chartered Accountants, registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, in the year 1957, KSCAA is primarily formed for the welfare of Chartered Accountants and represents before various regulatory authorities to resolve the problems / hardships faced by Chartered Accountants and business community.

As the first and second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic has ravaged the country for almost past 18 months and ever since, the country is slowly regaining impetus towards economic and overall stablization and growth. However, on current date the Country is again on the anvil of bracing the third wave of Covid-19 with problems related to business disruptions caused by first and second wave on an overall perspective still continue to grapple the citizens in meeting various statutory compliance calendars. At this juncture we would like to humbly submit to your good selves our representation highlighting suggestions on the rationalisation of Penalty Provisions u/s 270AA of Income Tax Act, 1961.

Backgrounds and Facts:

Section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) has been inserted by the Finance Act, 2016 with the effect from 1.4.2017 (AY 2017-18 being the first year of implementation). The penalty under the said section, may be levied under two legs i.e ‘under-reporting’ and ‘misreporting’ of income.

As per section 270A(7), the penalty reffered to in sub-section (1) [on account of under-reporting] shall be a sum equal to fifty percent of the amount of tax payable on under-reported income. In contrast to that, under section 270A(8), if such under-reported income is in consequence of any misreporting thereof, the penalty shall be equal to two hundred percent of tax payable on such under-reported income.

Finance Act, 2016 has also inserted on benevolent Section 270AA for granting immunity from imposition of penalty under section 270A as well as from initation of prosecution proceedings under section 276C or 276CC of the Act, subject to satisfaction of the following cumulative conditions:

i. Tax and interest has been paid within the period specified in the notice of demand issued under section 156 of the Act. Which is usually 30 days; and

ii. No appeal against the order issued u/s 270A has been filed.

As per rule 129, the application to the Ao to avail the immunity has to be filed in Form No. 68 within one month from the end of the month in which the order which is leading to initiation of penalty u/s 270A has been received.

The AO is required to dispose of such application within one month from the end of the month in which the application is received by either accepting or rejecting such application.

Analysis and Suggested Approach:

Since this is the first year of implementation of sections 270A and 270AA, there are instances of the above timelines not being followed by the Assessing Officers as well as Assessees.

Section 270AA of the Act being a beneficial provisions, as it seeks to provide an immunity from penalty and prosecution and to espouse its true purpose we may hereby urge that the time limits required for payments of demand as specified in the demand notice and filing of Form No. 68 can be little relaxed . The intent or purpose of this provision will still be met even in cases where there is only a minor delay in the payment of taxes or filing of Form No. 68 and so long as appeal is not filed against the order. Nevertheless, even though there is a delay, it is still pertinent to note that such taxes are paid along with additional interest. Therefore, there is no loss of revenue to Government if belated immunity applications are accepted.

Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme (VSVS) seeks to attain the same objective of the early settlement of cases/collection of taxes, grant of immunity from penalty, and prosecution. In view of Covid pandemic situation, the due dates for payment of taxes as determined by way of the issue of Form No. 3 have now been extended by the Government to 31.08.2021 (to 31.10.2021 with additional sum) from original due date of 31.03.2021 for that scheme. Alas, no similar corresponding reliefs have been forthcoming in respect of provisions of section 270A read with section 270AA of the Act, although these provisions operate on the same canvas as that VSVS . It may therefore lead to giving an indiscriminate and unfair treatment by tarring same brush to both groups of taxpayers as covered by section 270A and 270AA vis-a-vis group of taxpayers as covered by VSVS. The brunt of Covid-19 has been suffered by every citizen of this country, there is no one who has escaped unscathed from its fury and it is therefore we besiege to your good selves to please take cognizance of Covid-19 situation and provided a leniency by conceding minor slippages if there are any on the part of taxpayers in meeting the compliance timelines for payment tax/interest and filing of Form No. 68.

Incidentally, we would also wish to mention that as regards assessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 and AY 2017-18 qua to Transfer pricing cases even in these cases the fulfillment of all the conditions and timelines as specified in section 270A and 270AA poses a real predicament of current times owing to severe business disruptions caused by Covid pandemic.

If our above suggestions are accepted, it would also benefit the government in terms of 1) Reduction in litigation 2) Speeding up pf tax collections.

Our Representations:

i. A reasonable leniency may be exercised by the AOs to allow the Taxpayer’s who have paid the tax and interest beyond the time limit specified in the demand notice issued u/s 156 to accept the application and grant immunity u/s 270AA.

ii. A reasonable leniency may be exercised by the AOs to allow the Taxpayer’s to the file Form No. 68 beyond the limit of one month from the end of the month in which the order u/s 143(3) or 147 was received by taxpayer.

iii. AOs may be directed to expedite on the disposal of applications in Form No. 68 as received and pass orders within the limit of one month from the end of the month in which such applications are received as the same is stipulated u/s 270AA(4).

iv. Enunciate an IT enabled faceless process for the acceptance and disposal of Form No. 68 in lieu of manual process as being currently followed.

Yours sincerely,

For Karnataka State Chartered Accountants Association

Sd/-
CA. Kumar S Jigajinni
President
Sd/-
CA. Pramod Srihari
Secretary
Sd/-
CA. Ganesh V Shandage
Secretary

 



from Studycafe https://ift.tt/3mCssdj